Warning

Info

Tort-ally Awesome: Unraveling the Mysteries of Tort Law

Navigating the Tort-urous Terrain: What is a Tort, Anyway?
Apr 2, 2023

Introduction

Ah, torts – the bread and butter of many a personal injury attorney and the bane of first-year law students everywhere. But what exactly is a tort, and why does it sound like a delicious dessert that's been horribly misspelled? In this article, we'll delve into the fascinating world of tort law, exploring its origins, key principles, and various types (both tasty and otherwise). So, grab a fork and dig in – and don't worry, we promise to keep the legal jargon to a minimum (and the dry humor to a tasteful level).

Tort Law: A Brief (but Delicious) History

The word "tort" hails from the Latin "tortum," which means "twisted" or "wrong." While this may evoke images of a scrumptious pastry, it actually refers to a wrongful act or injury that leads to civil (rather than criminal) liability. Tort law has its roots in English common law, where it developed as a means to provide compensation for individuals who suffered harm at the hands of others.

Over time, tort law has evolved into a complex and multifaceted area of the law, encompassing a wide range of civil wrongs and remedies. Today, tort law serves as a cornerstone of the legal system, providing a framework for resolving disputes and compensating injured parties (and keeping personal injury attorneys gainfully employed). Are you still wondering, "what is a tort?"

The Three Flavors of Torts

Much like a well-stocked dessert cart, the world of torts offers a delectable assortment of options. While torts can be classified in various ways, they are generally divided into three main categories: intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability. Let's take a closer look at each type, shall we?

  1. Intentional Torts: As the name suggests, intentional torts involve deliberate acts that cause harm to another person. Examples include assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. In other words, if you intentionally throw a pie in someone's face, you might find yourself on the hook for an intentional tort (not to mention a waste of a perfectly good dessert).
  2. Negligence: This is perhaps the most well-known (and litigated) category of torts. Negligence occurs when a person fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another party. To prove negligence, a plaintiff must typically establish four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. So, if you're too busy daydreaming about cake to notice the banana peel on the floor, and someone slips and gets injured, you could be found negligent (and maybe a little clumsy).
  3. Strict Liability: In certain cases, a person can be held liable for harm caused to another party, regardless of intent or negligence. Strict liability typically applies in situations involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products. For example, if you decide to host a wild animal tea party and one of your guests is injured by a wayward tiger, you could be held strictly liable (and perhaps questioned about your choice of party entertainment).

Tort Law: The Ingredients for a Successful Claim

While torts come in many shapes and sizes, they share some common ingredients that are essential for a successful claim. These include:

  1. Duty: In tort law, duty refers to the legal obligation that one party owes to another. For example, a driver has a duty to operate their vehicle safely to avoid causing harm to others on the road.
  2. Breach: A breach occurs when a party fails to fulfill their duty, either through an intentional act or negligence. In other words, if you're driving while texting about your favorite pastry and cause an accident, you've breached your duty to drive safely (and should probably put the phone down).
  3. Causation: To establish causation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's breach of duty directly caused their injury. This typically involves proving both actual cause (the "but for" test) and proximate cause (whether the harm was a foreseeable result of the defendant's actions).
  4. Damages: Finally, a plaintiff must show that they suffered actual harm as a result of the defendant's breach. Damages can include physical injuries, property damage, emotional distress, or financial loss. If you can't prove damages, your tort claim is like a cake without icing – incomplete and unlikely to satisfy.

Tort Remedies: A Sweet Resolution

The primary goal of tort law is to provide compensation for injured parties, ensuring that those who cause harm are held accountable for their actions. In most cases, this compensation takes the form of monetary damages, which can be divided into several categories:

  1. Compensatory Damages: These damages are designed to make the plaintiff whole again by compensating them for their actual losses, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
  2. Punitive Damages: In some cases, a court may award punitive damages to punish a defendant for particularly egregious conduct and deter others from engaging in similar behavior. Think of punitive damages as the legal equivalent of a stern finger-wagging (with a hefty price tag attached).
  3. Equitable Remedies: In rare cases, a court may grant an equitable remedy, such as an injunction or specific performance, to provide relief when monetary damages are insufficient. While equitable remedies may not be as sweet as a slice of pie, they can still provide a satisfying resolution for injured parties.

Additional Resources for Tort Law Mastery

If you're still hungry for more information about tort law, there are plenty of resources available to help you dig deeper into this fascinating area of the law. For example, check out LSD+ briefs for a wealth of case brief examples that will help you understand what a tort is.

Conclusion

In the world of law, torts hold a special place as the vehicle for resolving civil disputes and compensating those who have been wronged. With its rich history and diverse array of categories, tort law offers an ever-evolving landscape for legal scholars and practitioners alike. So, whether you're a law student struggling to differentiate between intentional torts and negligence or a seasoned attorney with a penchant for pastry-related metaphors, understanding the nuances of tort law is essential for success in the legal profession.

Now that you've had a taste of tort law, we encourage you to continue exploring its many layers and flavors. And as you do so, remember to savor the experience – after all, it's not every day that you get to immerse yourself in a world that combines the thrill of justice with the allure of delectable desserts. Happy tort-ing!

Other Articles

  1. What Law School should I go to?
  2. Is Law School Worth It?
  3. What law school should I go to practice _____ law?
  4. How Much do Lawyers Make?
  5. How Do I Pay for Law School?
cryptanon HLS '22 & LSD creator

Tech-focused creator of LSD.Law. I built LSD while applying to law school. I saw unequal access to knowledge and built LSD to level the playing field and help applicants make thoughtful, well-informed decisions in the application process.

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
questioning whether i go to school for free at a lesser school or pay some out of pocket at a better name for the same degree at end of the day, the numbers don't lie
18:54
@DisillusionedHomelessWalnut: The way the curve works is a below-median student at Tennessee (curves to a 3.1, so B/B+) can end up with a better GPA than an above-average student at Elon (curves to a 2.67/B-minus), so the student from Tennessee will have a better transcript *and* get better jobs on average than someone with the same class rank at Elon
18:56
Your real alarm bell is Elon's curve (linked here, p. 70 https://eloncdn.blob.core.windows.net/eu3/sites/996/2019/07/2017-2018_Academic_Catalog-and-Student_Handbook.pdf) *requires* profs to give 20% of first-year students a C-minus or worse, when the school's bar for "satisfactory academic progress" is a C+ average
ooooffff. thanks. i mean, full ride is cool and all, but damn
18:59
The only scenario where a school does something like that (curve to a 2.67, dismiss students below 2.25) is when they're admitting a lot of students who may not pass the bar, then flunking people out mercilessly so the school can keep its accreditation (ABA requires 75% of grads to pass the bar within two years, can't fail the bar if the school doesn't let you graduate)
the dean told me "no students had their scholarships reduced in the past three years, and to my recollection only one scholarship in 19 years has been reduced when a student was in good standing"
yeah, i get that and appreciate you validating that point. i like to think it really wouldn't apply to me and assume it happens due to the lower standards of admissions they utilize, but is it (full ride) worth the risk? that's the fly in the ointment
just trying to weigh all angles, seems like just biting the bullet and paying the modest amount to UTK is a smarter decision
end of cycle is for the birds, but i'm playing the hand i was dealt :)
19:06
In general you are going to be better off at a school that wants its students to succeed. UTK seems to fit the description - they are not in any danger of losing their accreditation, don't need to force people out. Elon very much does not, if their bar passage drops 2% they'll be in violation of ABA requirements so they won't give students any leway
19:06
*leeway
i appreciate your insight, friend
manifestmoreadmissions
19:11
im too lazy to provide the same level of detail as JB but I agree UTK seems like a better bet to actually achieve your career goals and set yourself up for success. I would understand being conflicted if it were like UTK vs Belmont or a lower ranked school that isn't considered predatory but because it's Elon that makes it more clear to me
thank you
the counterpoint bouncing around my head is basically "if i'm worth a damn, as i think i am, i'll be just fine no matter what the curve is" but you folks are nudging me in the direction of logic and common sense
manifestmoreadmissions
19:18
plenty of the people who fall behind are worth a damn it's just that some schools are basically set up to screw people over
yeah. fall behind as in....miss homework? can't keep up with readings? something else?
kinda nervous coming in as an untraditional guy around KJD's, billy madison vibes over here
19:21
Re: costs, it's worth looking at costs all around, both schools cost (net tuition, $0 at Elon/$30K over 3 years if you're in-state at UTK) PLUS three years not earning money or advancing in your career, which is worth 6 figures if you make decent money now. $30K in tuition is a small share of total costs in this comparison
19:24
"Fall behind" in this context means law school curves are rigid, no matter how hard everyone studies half the class will be below-median, 25% in the bottom quarter, etc. It's not super predictable either, so a student above GPA or LSAT median could still end up bottom half or 1/4 of the class
gotcha. predatory in that instance is certainly appropriate
manifestmoreadmissions
19:32
i am not kjd but im glad jb cleared that up for you lmao
19:32
And assuming similar class rank, UTK grads tend to do better in public data. Top students at UTK have a shot at biglaw (pays $225K), top students at Elon end up at small/medium firms (worse pay). Average students at UTK can get jobs at small/medium firms, average students at Elon are on the bubble for any firm job at all. Below-average students at UTK have a shot at firm jobs or other work, below-average students at Elon might not get jobs (or pass the bar, or avoid academic dismissal). That's the major advantage of well-regarded schools - more upside, less downside
manifestmoreadmissions
19:32
but yeah just reiterating that you could be worth so many damns and still not do well because its set up for that
19:37
(This is ignoring public service/government jobs, because the stats there don't tell us much about the type of job - "super competitive Department of Justice job in DC making $90K" and "local government job earning $50K" both get lumped together under the "public service" label, but say v. different things about a school's job placement
really appreciate all the insight
manifestmoreadmissions
23:07
for those going to school in fall 24 when did you add your school to your linkedin profile
MightyUnableSphinx
23:13
add as soon as you get in! :)
MightyUnableSphinx
23:13
it's like a little micro celebration!
23:15
Anyone else here plan on practicing around PDX?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.