Warning

Info

Warning

Info

MadBadger
Class of 2027
First choice school:
?
3.93/4.3
GPA
double major: economics and philosophy
-/180
LSAT
User stats
GRE
334
Softs
T2
Fellow at prestigious global philanthropy in an international office
URM
Work
1-4 years
Management consulting
Goal
-
Apps submitted
0
Scholarships Received
$0
MadBadger's wisdom for future generations

School apps

Warning

Info

Rank
2023-2024
Result App type FW Resident Schol... Sent Sent raw Received Received raw Complete Complete raw UR UR raw UR2 UR2 raw II II raw Decision Decision raw

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
llama
18:11
@info-man: they mad jealous
info-man
18:12
obviously doesn't move the needle on admissions but i think that encapsulates how poorly understood the softs tiers are
windyMagician
18:12
and when he eat the cookie he got good form
lilypadfrog
18:14
it’s definitely something that would make an outsider say wow that’s a cool thing to do. which is better than a lot of softs.
llama
18:14
Double chocolate chunk COOKIE
info-man
18:15
@lilypadfrog: right, and i think that's the lens through which people would analyze softs instead of asking if they fall on an arbitrary hierarchy
info-man
18:15
would a third-party reflecting on that experience think it's cool or interesting or says something about you as an individual
llama
18:15
yea @info/lily- it shows u are comfortable talking infront of a crowd (ie courtroom parallel) so i think it could be spun favorably, it is uncommon, hence T3
info-man
18:15
i wouldn't be caught dead doing litigation
info-man
18:15
transactions baby
llama
18:16
whatever saul goodman
TaraDactyl
18:17
appreciate the feedback yall, thanks
windyMagician
18:20
I wouldnt be caught dead doing corporate
llama
18:20
Windy 'Wolf of Alaska' Magician
PizzaDude
18:22
i wouldnt be caught dead
lilypadfrog
18:23
I would catch you alive
llama
18:24
i would catch a grenade for ya
PizzaDude
18:24
thats one of my karaoke songs
llama
18:25
some1 help: what is the logical fallacy of accusing the other side of exactly what bad thing u are doing
jackfrost11770
18:25
so confused by tex's vandy result is he literally the only one
InstinctiveCaringUrchin
18:28
@llama "tu quoque fallacy". Although hypocrisy also works
info-man
18:28
@jackfrost11770: gotta be YP but also when did that even happen
jackfrost11770
18:30
today
jackfrost11770
18:30
no else seems to have gotten a vandy result (that's what i'm referring to confusion wise)
info-man
18:30
huh. that's weird
llama
18:31
@InstinctiveCaringUrchin: ty.
windyMagician
18:34
wolf of alaska is a good nickname
InstinctiveCaringUrchin
18:34
@llama: np. But tu quoque is when you specifically point out the OTHER individual's hypocrisy. May not be appropriate for your use case idk
llama
18:36
@InstinctiveCaringUrchin: I just spent 20min reading thru a bunch of fallacies...Ig I was mixing hypocrisy w/ stol
Eggan
18:36
YP from CUNY
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.