Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

People v. William Freeman (1847)

Read a random definition: State Justice Institute

A quick definition of People v. William Freeman (1847) :

People v. William Freeman (1847) was a court case where a man named William Freeman was accused of murdering four people. His lawyer argued that Freeman was not responsible for his actions because he had a mental illness. However, the jury did not believe this and found Freeman guilty. Later, a higher court said that even if a defendant is found competent to stand trial, they can still argue that they were insane at the time of the crime. Freeman was granted a new trial but died before it could happen.

A more thorough explanation:

People v. William Freeman (1847) was a landmark case in the United States legal system. It was the first case where a defendant used an insanity defense. The case was heard and decided by the New York Supreme Court.

Background: William Freeman was a Black and Indigenous man who was convicted of stealing a horse and sentenced to five years of prison with hard labor. During his imprisonment, he would often refuse to work and proclaim his innocence instead. In response, he would be beaten by the prison guards. One of these beatings resulted in Freeman receiving a severe brain injury, which gave him mental confusion and deafness. Six months after he was released from Auburn Prison, Freeman was accused of murdering four members of the Van Nest family in Cayuga County.

The Trial: William H. Seward decided to take the case as Freeman’s lawyer, believing that Freeman had a mental illness and should not be held responsible for his actions. He argued that Freeman was insane, and brought in witnesses who testified about what Freeman was like before his injuries and after. He also brought in medical experts who testified that they believed Freeman was insane. Despite these efforts, the jury still found Freeman sane and competent for the trial, and the case was moved forward. During the trial, the judge refused to let in the medical expert testimony proclaiming Freeman as insane. After both sides presented their evidence, the jury found Freeman guilty of the murders and he was sentenced to death.

Appeal: Seward continued to advocate for Freeman after the trial ended and filed an appeal, arguing the trial court should have allowed the medical testimony to be presented to the jury. The appellate court reversed the trial court decision and held that even if a defendant is held to be competent enough to stand trial, they can still present evidence during the trial to support their defense of insanity. Freeman was granted a new trial but died soon after the appellate court decision.

Example: People v. William Freeman (1847) was a significant case in the United States legal system because it was the first case where a defendant used an insanity defense. William Freeman was accused of murdering four members of the Van Nest family in Cayuga County. His lawyer argued that Freeman was insane, but the jury still found him guilty. The case was later appealed, and the appellate court held that even if a defendant is held to be competent enough to stand trial, they can still present evidence during the trial to support their defense of insanity.

people | Per

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:08
same
13:08
twinnnn
13:08
still in limbo tho
13:08
pull up u can meet ur fav insta influencer
13:08
...
13:08
im not a gooner, twin
13:08
me :)
NosyBeagle
13:08
@esoterica: you're married? this is going to ruin the tour
13:08
sorry baby
13:09
had to happen
13:09
I do have a buddy that is going to a law school in Michigan tho
13:09
Me too im going to cooley
13:09
you guys should connect!
13:09
he can thridwheel you and cynical
13:09
im tryna link and build
13:09
lets touch a million this year, twin
13:10
Okay i gotta go now bye bye
13:10
ily
13:10
im tryna ball out till i fall out
13:11
bye twin!! til we see again!
god salad is a gift
omg are the umich crowd connecting
CUTE!!!!!
NosyBeagle
13:12
byebye eso
we been linked up
15:27
guys i just got my lsac cumulative gpa back and its 3.3... what is the best fast food restaruant to work at
NosyBeagle
15:29
mcdonald's so you can smell like the fryer for the rest of your life. on a serious note, mine is lower than yours and i still here. do you very best on the lsat and have a killer application. good luck!
15:29
thanks gang <3
15:29
we got this we scrappy
NosyBeagle
15:29
hell yea we do <3
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.