Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

People v. William Freeman (1847)

Read a random definition: TAN

A quick definition of People v. William Freeman (1847) :

People v. William Freeman (1847) was a court case where a man named William Freeman was accused of murdering four people. His lawyer argued that Freeman was not responsible for his actions because he had a mental illness. However, the jury did not believe this and found Freeman guilty. Later, a higher court said that even if a defendant is found competent to stand trial, they can still argue that they were insane at the time of the crime. Freeman was granted a new trial but died before it could happen.

A more thorough explanation:

People v. William Freeman (1847) was a landmark case in the United States legal system. It was the first case where a defendant used an insanity defense. The case was heard and decided by the New York Supreme Court.

Background: William Freeman was a Black and Indigenous man who was convicted of stealing a horse and sentenced to five years of prison with hard labor. During his imprisonment, he would often refuse to work and proclaim his innocence instead. In response, he would be beaten by the prison guards. One of these beatings resulted in Freeman receiving a severe brain injury, which gave him mental confusion and deafness. Six months after he was released from Auburn Prison, Freeman was accused of murdering four members of the Van Nest family in Cayuga County.

The Trial: William H. Seward decided to take the case as Freeman’s lawyer, believing that Freeman had a mental illness and should not be held responsible for his actions. He argued that Freeman was insane, and brought in witnesses who testified about what Freeman was like before his injuries and after. He also brought in medical experts who testified that they believed Freeman was insane. Despite these efforts, the jury still found Freeman sane and competent for the trial, and the case was moved forward. During the trial, the judge refused to let in the medical expert testimony proclaiming Freeman as insane. After both sides presented their evidence, the jury found Freeman guilty of the murders and he was sentenced to death.

Appeal: Seward continued to advocate for Freeman after the trial ended and filed an appeal, arguing the trial court should have allowed the medical testimony to be presented to the jury. The appellate court reversed the trial court decision and held that even if a defendant is held to be competent enough to stand trial, they can still present evidence during the trial to support their defense of insanity. Freeman was granted a new trial but died soon after the appellate court decision.

Example: People v. William Freeman (1847) was a significant case in the United States legal system because it was the first case where a defendant used an insanity defense. William Freeman was accused of murdering four members of the Van Nest family in Cayuga County. His lawyer argued that Freeman was insane, but the jury still found him guilty. The case was later appealed, and the appellate court held that even if a defendant is held to be competent enough to stand trial, they can still present evidence during the trial to support their defense of insanity.

people | Per

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
having the gene that makes cilantro taste like soap makes me wanna kms
NosyBeagle
13:31
cliantro is the devil
u get me
NosyBeagle
13:46
when i got hello fresh order, i'd leave the clinatro they gave in the fridge for my mom to use. that devil will never touch my food
thinking of getting hello fresh for law school
NosyBeagle
14:09
it is a hit or a miss can be very pricey after they reel you in.
NosyBeagle
14:10
but you can skip deliveries for awhile and only get them when you want
NosyBeagle
14:43
dont even feel like drilling rn. all i ever do is drill... maybe i wanna grill
@badhorrormovie: i'm gucci, drinking a crisp diet coke and trying to survive work
wait i just read chat, didn't know this was a cilantro-hating safe space
AngryMiniCar
15:41
I want to study rn but I need to finish this one task
AngryMiniCar
15:41
And I can't finish it because the firm system is acting up
AngryMiniCar
15:41
PLEASE
AngryMiniCar
15:41
@NosyBeagle: go get yourself a coke
AngryMiniCar
15:42
You deserve it
AngryMiniCar
15:42
Or a small cake
NosyBeagle
15:44
no cake.. too much sugar
NosyBeagle
15:44
ill just have some candy out of my coworker's jar
AngryMiniCar
15:44
^^ LMAO
AngryMiniCar
15:45
Funny you say that I just stole some from our office coordinator
AngryMiniCar
15:45
She has a cute bowl of caramels
NosyBeagle
15:50
i love caramel
why does everything at the bank take 500 hours
NosyBeagle
15:55
lol no way i went to the bank today too
17:09
@windyMagician: my sibling ordered hello fresh and got tired of getting very similar ingredients every time...and then got food poisoning from one of the boxes. would not recommend
17:10
i think it would be more worth to meal prep on your own on a weekend for less cost and better personal taste
i usually meal prep as a grown up
CurvyHypnoticSheepdog
20:55
I have returned
NarrowFaithfulCougar
23:16
@CurvyHypnoticSheepdog: Welcome back to hell!
How much does law schools scrutinize your transcript. I have a lot of AP credits which show up as "P" on my transcript but my gpa of classes i took is a 4.1x
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.