Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

trial court

Read a random definition: concubinage

A quick definition of trial court:

A trial court is where a case is heard for the first time. This court decides what happened in the case and what the law says about it. If someone disagrees with the decision, they can ask a higher court to review it. Trial courts can hear many different types of cases, but some courts only hear certain kinds of cases.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Trial courts are courts that hear a case for the first time. They are also known as courts of original jurisdiction. A trial court makes decisions based on both facts and laws presented during a full trial. The decisions made by a trial court can be appealed to a higher court for review. In contrast, an appellate court only reviews the decisions made by the trial court and is limited to certain issues.

Both the federal and state governments have designated trial courts. A trial court of general jurisdiction can hear any civil or criminal case that is not already exclusively within the jurisdiction of another court. Examples of trial courts of general jurisdiction include the United States district courts on the federal level and state-level trial courts such as the New York Supreme Courts and the California Superior Courts. A trial court of limited jurisdiction can only hear specific kinds of cases based on subject matter, amount in controversy, statutory grant, or administrative matters.

Examples:

  • A person is charged with a crime and their case is heard in a trial court. The trial court hears evidence from both the prosecution and defense and makes a decision based on the facts and laws presented.
  • A couple is getting a divorce and their case is heard in a trial court. The trial court hears evidence from both parties and makes a decision on how to divide their assets and determine child custody.

These examples illustrate how trial courts are responsible for hearing cases for the first time and making decisions based on the evidence presented. The decisions made by the trial court can be appealed to a higher court for review.

Trial | trial de novo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.