Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

expert testimony

Read a random definition: diplomatic representation

A quick definition of expert testimony:

Expert testimony: When someone who knows a lot about a certain topic talks in court to help the judge and jury understand the facts of a case. This person is called an expert witness. They usually talk about technical or scientific things like medicine or forensics. The expert's opinion can only be used if it meets certain rules, like being based on facts and reliable methods. Sometimes, the judge might not let an expert's opinion be used if it's not good enough.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Expert testimony is when an expert witness gives their opinion on a technical or scientific subject during a trial or deposition. This opinion is relevant to a lawsuit or criminal case. The Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702 sets out the requirements for expert testimony to be admissible.

For example, in a murder trial, a forensic expert may give their opinion on the cause of death based on their examination of the victim's body. This opinion can help the jury understand the evidence and determine the facts of the case.

However, not all expert testimony is admissible. In Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, the Supreme Court affirmed a District Court’s decision not to admit expert testimony on tire marks and treads because there was no indication that other experts in the industry use the expert's particular approach or that tire experts normally make the very fine distinctions necessary to support his conclusions.

Overall, expert testimony is an important part of many trials and can help the jury understand complex technical or scientific subjects.

expenses of administration | expert witness

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
10:09
What is up saturday morning gunners
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
13:20
Both of you make valid points, but if you do not get off the W/L your only options are to R&R or just not pursue. So yea if it makes sense and you can go this year, it may be better than R&R in hopes of better prospects next yr. the devil you know is better than the angel you don't where devil is this cycle and angel is next cycel
i don't think reapplying is going to hurt you from a previously WL/denied school
just make sure you're coming with new things on your resume. maybe a higher lsat or some work experience. a school may not of wanted you this cycle, but if you come back with stronger stats, you're gonna be what they might be looking for.
overall, i'd say work on boosting your lsat though!!
14:18
These decision times are so long, its crazy how I have to put in a deposit without knowing a couple of decisions
14:19
"rolling admissions" will haunt me forever
noreaster
11:05
good way of showing fluctuations over time
MrThickRopes
11:11
Easter waves TD?
Real
checking anyways
17:54
@MrThickRopes: not likely
MrThickRopes
19:01
You was right
Jacobdoeshisbest
19:17
Anyone here go to ookla for undergrad?
MrThickRopes
21:01
Type shit type shit
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.