Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

legal-certainty test

Read a random definition: passing on

A quick definition of legal-certainty test:

A legal-certainty test is a way for a court to decide if they have the power to hear a case. It looks at the amount of money that is being argued about and decides if it meets the minimum requirement for the court to get involved. If the amount claimed in the lawsuit is less than the minimum, the court cannot hear the case. For example, in a federal court, the amount in controversy must be more than $75,000 for the court to have the power to hear the case.

A more thorough explanation:

The legal-certainty test is a method used in civil procedure to determine if the amount in controversy is sufficient to establish the court's jurisdiction. The amount claimed in the complaint usually controls, but if there is a "legal certainty" that the claim is actually less than the minimum amount required, the court may not have jurisdiction.

For example, if someone sues for $100,000 in damages, but it is clear that they cannot prove more than $50,000 in damages, the court may not have jurisdiction because the legal certainty test shows that the amount in controversy is less than the minimum required.

The legal-certainty test is important because it ensures that cases are heard in the appropriate court and that the court has the authority to make a decision. Without this test, parties could potentially file lawsuits in any court regardless of the amount in controversy, leading to confusion and inefficiency in the legal system.

legal centralism | legal citology

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:11
100%, that's why I think the sub is untethered to reality. but/and I was aiming for tippy top schools, and I think it's not wild to have that goal if you have reasons :)
16:11
many people have different ideas of what a good outcome would be and have even more different ideas of what amount of work they would like to put to get there
Any acceptances today?
16:12
nop
16:12
couple yesterday
NosyBeagle
16:13
@DivergentBoundlessHuman: help i thought u meant BL as in boy love and not big law
NosyBeagle
16:13
it appears i have yaoi on the brain
16:13
Reddit in particular is so myopic about outcomes, there are large portions of the country where making 80k still gives you a comfortable life, and ~80k is often cited as the low end of the bimodal distribution of private attorney salaries
not saying reaching for a t-14 is a wild thing to do!!!! man i would go to nyu. i'm simply stating what esoterica said, people that act like not being at a t-14 means your life is over is simply not correct. but i think anyone outside of reddit would understand that.
fujos after stubbing their toe: YAOI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AngryMiniCar
16:16
LMAOO @badhorrormovie where did that even come from
AngryMiniCar
16:17
Also someone linked a redditpost here for RC wrong answer journals. I forgot who it was can you do it again :')
BEAGLE SAID YAOI and that popped into my brain i had to say something 💔 ,, also here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/v7w3ay/wrong_answer_guide_for_rc/
AngryMiniCar
16:25
THANK YOU!
UR WELCOME!!!! u will master rc we believe in u
AngryMiniCar
16:28
<3
let us take a moment to think about how the lsat was 10 sections when it was first created....glad they don't do that anymore that's for sure
I got a 164, which was 3 points higher than my all-time highest PT. so I'm good
16:41
i love u bad horror movie
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:45
excuse me WHAT? TEN sections?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:46
this old old old guy I work with (not a lawyer, not in a law-related field) found out I'm going to law school and started telling me stories about when he took the LSAT back in the day. said something about either inventing or interpreting a made-up language? and doing math? I was like, no way can this be real. but now you have me wondering
16:52
I think that was back when it first started, and it was mostly oral exams. The 70's and 80's were similar content to whats on it now, but you had to write the essay while taking the rest of the exam
16:52
bro tht how the lsat felt for me
NosyBeagle
16:52
@badhorrormovie: ily
NosyBeagle
16:54
yeah if the lsat was 10 sections, i'd quit so fast man screw that
NosyBeagle
16:54
4 is ENOUGH
NosyBeagle
16:54
hell i hate the experimental bs it should just be 3
@NosyBeagle: ILY2
NosyBeagle
16:55
"b-but we need to test these new que--" **loud incorrect buzzer*
@bigfatsloth: I LOVE U BIG FAT SLOTH
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.