Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

false evidence

Read a random definition: sealed-record statute

A quick definition of false evidence:

False evidence is when someone presents information that is not true in a legal setting, such as in a trial or affidavit. This can include testimony that is not based on direct knowledge or is intentionally misleading. It is important to have truthful evidence in order to make fair and just decisions in legal cases.

A more thorough explanation:

False evidence refers to evidence that is not true or accurate. It can include false testimony given by a witness under oath or affirmation, or any other type of evidence that is intentionally or unintentionally misleading.

  • Dropsy testimony: This is a slang term used to describe a police officer's false testimony that a suspect dropped an illegal substance that was then confiscated by the police and used as probable cause for arresting the suspect. This type of false evidence is sometimes given when an arrest has been made without probable cause, as when illegal substances have been found through an improper search.
  • Cumulative testimony: This refers to identical or similar testimony by more than one witness, offered by a party to impress the jury with the apparent weight of proof on that party's side. The trial court typically limits cumulative testimony.
  • False testimony: This refers to testimony that is untrue. It is broader than perjury, which has a state-of-mind element. Unlike perjury, false testimony does not denote a crime.

These examples illustrate how false evidence can be used to manipulate the legal system and influence the outcome of a trial. It is important for witnesses and other parties involved in legal proceedings to be truthful and provide accurate evidence to ensure a fair and just outcome.

false designation of origin | falsehood

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
esoterica
21:22
twinnnnnn
PoliticalInterestingJellyfish
21:23
Hi
PoliticalInterestingJellyfish
21:24
What should i doooo, Penn v Michigan
PoliticalInterestingJellyfish
21:24
Penn v Mich v HLS
esoterica
21:25
depends on what your goals are and how concerned you are about debt. HLS if u want unicorn stuff; Penn if u want big law and got good money from them and don't like the midwest; Michigan if you're a certified chiller and got good money from them
Applesaucer
21:27
If ur poor u should go to harvard. If ur rich go to penn. If ur middle class go to michigan
21:28
Margin of Utility says HLS
Applesaucer
21:28
161!
esoterica
21:28
I will say some of the coolest and most beautiful women in the world are going to Michigan law school next year if that factors into your decision at all
21:29
occam's razor says flip a three sided coin
21:29
and you are not reading what someone with a 161 wrote. if those are ur options, u are going to be able to figure it out without my input. I will pipe down (ur mom) now.
why do some higher ranked schools give much better scholarships than lower
21:34
betta school bigga endowment, mo scholly. i thinks
esoterica
21:40
yeah this is part of why it is so helpful to get the highest LSAT you can. paradoxically, the higher the rank of the school u get into the better the scholarship u are potentially capable of getting
21:41
also, the value *not money/dollar* is simply higher at a high ranked school than alternatives, to an extent, it seems, t.me, 0L who will likely not go to LS
21:42
@testingusername213: also helpful is https://app.lawhub.org/law-school-transparency
With my stats, is a near full ride possible at a top 120 school?
22:00
@testingusername213: UofAZ, Penn State it appears u are likely for FULL.
22:17
both top 100
@esoterica: youre too kind
22:23
@windyMagician: What's more, they have beautiful minds <3
22:24
(dolph, ILY 4evr)
Mostlylegal
22:47
If i had to pick between h p or m id choose p then h then m
Mostlylegal
22:48
Hope this helps!
esoterica
23:07
u bitter cuz they rejected u so fast
[M] esoterica
23:08
You have been reported. I am not a bot. I am a Volunteer Reddit moderator. I do not have mod powers but my reports are taken seriously and those who ge on my bad side tend to get banned in under 24 hours. I have numerous rules, which you may read in my post history, but 1 is the most important rule of all • I am an officer in training, and I expect to be treated the same way I would be with my uniform and badge. Watch your back and get used to this face kiddo, you'll be seeing a lot of it.
Applesaucer
23:08
🫡
Mostlylegal
23:29
Yes maam mrs hall monitor
im quaking in my boots
my stats are 3.71 and a 160, do you guys think I have a chance at St Johns Law?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.