Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

constructive

Read a random definition: Compact Clause

A quick definition of constructive:

Term: Constructive

Definition: Constructive means that even if something is not technically true, it is legally declared to be true. This is done to make sure that the law is not easily avoided or ignored. For example, if a landlord makes living conditions so bad that a tenant has no choice but to leave, it is considered a constructive eviction. This is treated the same as a real eviction, and the tenant has the same rights and protections.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Constructive means something is legally declared, even if not technically true in a given case. Lawmakers and judges can decide to make things constructively true so that the intent of the laws cannot be easily thwarted by a loophole or lack of personal responsibility.

For example, constructive eviction occurs when a landlord does not go through the process of actually evicting a tenant, but instead creates living conditions so poor that a reasonable person would have no choice but to leave the premises. If something is constructive, it is treated as if it were true in the eyes of the court. A constructive eviction, for example, is treated the same as if a tenant was truly evicted and that tenant is entitled to the same protections and remedies.

Another example of constructive is constructive notice. This means that even if someone did not actually receive notice of something, they are still considered to have knowledge of it because they should have known about it. For instance, if a property owner puts up a "no trespassing" sign on their land, but someone enters the land without seeing the sign, they can still be held liable for trespassing because they should have known that the land was off-limits.

The examples illustrate the definition of constructive by showing how something can be legally treated as true even if it is not technically true. In both cases, constructive measures are put in place to ensure that the intent of the law is upheld and that people cannot use loopholes or lack of personal responsibility to avoid consequences.

construction lien | constructive contract

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:42
no
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
13:42
Not really Cornell is pretty bad for clerkships
MightyUnableSphinx
13:42
huh
MightyUnableSphinx
13:42
what you are wanting to do would be very difficult for me to do tbh
MightyUnableSphinx
13:43
but if you know what you want, then what you want to do makes 100% perfect crystal clear sense
SuaveCrouton
13:43
Cornell is a biglaw factory
13:44
cornell def has a stronger network on the east coast and that's where id like to able to practice eventually but... it feels wrong and Notre dame feels right
13:45
Cornell's "eventually clerk" number is 20%. It's not as high as some other schools (their "eventually clerk" % is also higher than the "right after graduation" figure) but not super different from other T14s either
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
13:46
Jb can I do California big law from cornell
13:52
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Hard to say for sure. CA is Cornell's #3 destination (per https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/EQSummaryReport-4-3-2024.pdf), but that's a small share of the class - 8 grads out of 174 compared to 111 in New York. Probably some self-selection (a lot of people looking at NYC biglaw), but you'd likely need to get good grades and put serious effort into networking. Not a layup like Cornell to NYC.
13:53
Did NYU have another E wave yesterday?
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
13:53
Okay thank you for the detailed explanation. Looks like NYC it is. Betting on 8 out of 174 is hubris
13:58
Worth noting it's probably not 8 out of 174 people with CA as their goal - if someone goes to Cornell, they're almost certainly interested in NYC or open to it - but maybe 8 of a couple dozen that apply to CA
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
13:59
Alright, there’s probably some self selection but it’s not nearly as consistent as. Cornell—>NYC
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: how do you know? asking for a friend..
^^that a ton of people are getting off GULC WL
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
14:38
Gulc pulls a huge amount of people from waitlist every year
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
14:38
Gulc waitlist is the only good waitlist to be on with Harvard a distant second
15:29
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: do you have any easy to understand stats to show what you’re talking about? I know a lot of the data on here will show it if you’re smart enough to understand it… but alas I am not
15:30
Like approximately how many people get pulled, maybe specifics of off what lists (I’ve heard blanket statements of 33, 33, 33 and 50, 25, 25)
LegalUsername
15:32
Does anyone know if GULC decisions ever come out on the weekends?
15:33
Cuz all I’ve been able to tell from the last few years data vs this year is there’s FAR more people on the WL and far less Rs. So I’d assume the odds this year aren’t gonna be nearly as good as previous years
15:35
@LegalUsername: I believe I have seen a couple people that said they had decisions on Saturdays but I haven’t seen a wave on Saturdays or anything on Sundays
LegalUsername
15:36
Ah thanks for clarifying
Ijustwannagetinman
15:56
@jb2028: do you have discord? I wanted to ask you a question about something app related that is too specific to ask on here
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
15:56
Looks like roughly 5% of waitlisted applicants input As on lsd
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
15:57
That is deflated because not everyone who gets waitlisted updates after waitlist and Gulc filters their waitlist pretty heavily early on
15:59
What do you mean by filters early on?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.