A more thorough explanation:

Constructive eviction is a situation where a landlord does not physically or legally evict a tenant, but their actions or failure to act make it impossible for the tenant to use and enjoy the property. This breach of the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment can be considered "eviction in fact."

For constructive eviction to occur, the landlord must substantially interfere with the tenant's use and enjoyment of the property, and the tenant must give notice of the problem. If the landlord fails to respond and resolve the issue, the tenant can vacate the property within a reasonable amount of time.

Examples of conduct that can lead to constructive eviction include severe insect infestations, preventing tenants from obtaining electricity, and failure to provide heating. In the case of Johnson v. Cabrera, a frozen pipe prevented the use of a rented building during the winter months. The court ruled that a partial constructive eviction occurred when the tenant vacated only the affected part of the property or for a limited period of time.

If a tenant is constructively evicted, they are not required to pay rent, and it can be used as a defense against a landlord's attempt to recover rent.