Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

allegation of use

Read a random definition: sanitary code

A quick definition of allegation of use:

Allegation of Use: This refers to a legal process in which a trademark applicant declares that they have started using their trademark in commerce. It is a part of the trademark application amendment process.

When a trademark applicant files an allegation of use, they are stating that they have begun using their trademark in connection with the goods or services listed in their application. This is an important step in the trademark registration process, as it shows that the applicant is actively using their trademark in commerce.

The allegation of use is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and must be supported by evidence of use, such as photographs, advertising materials, or sales records. Once the USPTO approves the allegation of use, the trademark registration process can continue.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An allegation of use is a legal claim made by a trademark applicant that they are currently using the trademark in commerce. This claim is made during the trademark application process and is required for the trademark to be registered.

Example: If a company applies for a trademark for their new product, they must provide evidence that they are currently using the trademark in commerce. This evidence could include sales records, advertising materials, or other documentation that proves the trademark is being used in connection with the sale of goods or services.

Explanation: The example illustrates how an allegation of use is made during the trademark application process. The applicant must provide evidence that they are currently using the trademark in commerce, which is necessary for the trademark to be registered. Without this evidence, the trademark application may be denied.

allegatio falsi | allegations-of-the-complaint rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
AngryMiniCar
9:21
Could be depending on those softs
Waiting on Notre Dame, Fordham, Gould, and Texas A&M.
🙏
Hurry tf up
10:05
coworker watching insta reels at full volume i’m boutta crash the fuck out
10:05
That one coworker thats just gotta go. God hes ready. God take him please god
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.