Warning

Info

When Should I Apply to Law School?

Soon, but not too soon, but also not too late.
Apr 2, 2023

Table of Contents

  1. What time of year is best to apply?
  2. When in my life should I apply?
  3. Unsolicited opinion
  4. Related Articles

When you ask this question you might mean a few things. You might mean: What time of the year is it best to apply to law school? or you might mean: When in my life should I apply to law school. The first one is easier so I will explain that one first. 

What time of the year is best to apply to law school?

Check out our recommended law school application timeline here

Pretty much every law school has rolling admissions. This means that their applications are ‘open’ from around September to May, but you are much more likely to get accepted if you apply as early as possible.

The best time to apply to law school is when you are ready to commit to the three years of study required to earn a Juris Doctor (JD) degree. The best time to apply to law school is also when you have a clear sense of why you want to become a lawyer and how you will use your law degree to achieve your professional goals. 

The process of applying to law school can be time-consuming and expensive, so it is important to make sure you are ready to commit to the process before you begin. The best time to apply to law school is when you have completed your undergraduate degree and taken the LSAT. 

The best time to apply to law school is also when you have a clear idea of what you want to do with your law degree. Are you interested in working in a particular field of law? Do you want to become a prosecutor or public defender? Do you want to work in a private law firm? Knowing what you want to do with your degree will help you choose the right law school and prepare for your career. 

The best time to apply to law school is also when you have a realistic idea of the time and effort required to succeed in law school and pass the bar exam. Law school is a demanding academic environment, and you will need to study hard to earn good grades. You should also be prepared to dedicate time to extracurricular activities, such as moot court and law review, which can help you develop important legal skills. 

Finally, the best time to apply to law school is when you are financially prepared to cover the cost of tuition and living expenses. Law school is a significant investment, and you will need to be sure you can afford the cost before you apply. 

If you are ready to commit to the time and effort required to earn a law degree, and you have a clear idea of why you want to become a lawyer, the best time to apply to law school is now.​​ 

When in my life should I apply to law school?

Simply put, you should go to law school when you want to be a lawyer, or when getting a JD will help your career. But I realize that that isn't really helpful.

First, some stats.

Between 20-30% of 1Ls are KJD (meaning they went straight from H.S. to Undergrad then straight to Law School). Another (probably) 10-15% got some kind of Master's right after undergrad but before law school so they aren't KJD, but have also always been in school. Over 50% of 1Ls are under 25. About 20% of 1Ls are over 30.

Cool, so those are a bunch of numbers that might not be helpful.

Honestly, the question is so personal, that I can't give you a good answer. But I can give some pros and cons that you might not be considering:

KJD aka Straight Through aka ~19 years of school with no break.

Pros:

  1. You never leave school mode so you might be better set to study every day
  2. Your guardians are more likely to support you financially
  3. You get started on a legal career younger

Cons:

  1. Undergrad academics are super different than law school academics (for most) so you might not have the right mentality to succeed at law school
  2. Experience might make you a better applicant and help you get into a better school. This is especially true if you don't have a stellar GPA
  3. Most people don't actually know what they want to do with the rest of their life when they are 22. (Sorry to those of you who are, but consider leaving the lasting decisions to Med School students).

~2-4 years out of undergrad

Pros:

  1. The most common age group to go, so you will be surrounded by people close to you in age
  2. You have some work experience so you will (hopefully) have a better sense of what you want to do professionally
  3. You might still get some support from your family and you can probably coast on their insurance for a little longer.

Cons:

  1. Social pressures might be strong, and your social life might encroach on academics.
  2. Your work experience might not be strong enough to help your application.
  3. Most financial aid offices will still consider your parents income, regardless of how much help they are giving you

~4-8 years out of undergrad

Pros:

  1. You're pretty likely to know what you want to do when you grow up, and if that is being a lawyer, you most likely won't regret it
  2. Your work experience is probably substantial enough to help your application
  3. Most financial aid offices stop looking at your parents/guardians income around age 28 so you are likely to get better financial aid

Cons:

  1. You will be a little older than many of your peers and might find it harder to fit in socially
  2. You will be ~30 when you start your legal career and you might feel behind younger peers
  3. Your family is probably less likely to give you money than when you were younger

~8+ years out of undergrad

Pros:

  1. At this point you have a good amount of work experience and probably have a really good sense that law school is for you (or not)
  2. You should be able to tell a compelling story about how law school will help you further your professional journey
  3. You are most likely mature enough to buckle down and crush law school academically if you want

Cons:

  1. You will be the oldest person many rooms at law school. Maybe even older than some of your professors. This can be isolating
  2. Implicit agism will come into play in admissions and your chances of getting in might not be as high as if you were younger

My unsolicited opinion

I think that many undergrads feel like if they don't immediately go to law school that they will not have succeeded, or they use it as way to put off going to work. While this works for some people, a lot of KJD (or even people who are 2 years out) don't really know why they are at law school. As a result, it is really hard to give law school the focus required to really excel and subsequently younger applicants don't do as well during and after school. The flip side of that is that a lot young law students (more than older law students) make social connections in law school that are much stronger than older peers.

Overall, everyone is different so it is hard to give one-size fits all advice. What I can say with confidence is that you should go to law school when you know that you are ready, and when you are prepared to put into law school what you want to get out of law school. If that is a social life, great. If that is a killer job after, also great. Just make law school something you did, not something that happened to you.

Related Articles

  1. Is Law School Worth It?
  2. Lawyer or Paralegal
  3. How do I apply to Law School?
  4. How Much do Lawyers Make?
Windsor MIT '22, Harvard College Advisor

I am the half of LSD that didn't take the LSAT, or go to law school (Sorry about that). But I did go to MIT business school while surrounded by law students and lawyers, so I am somewhat qualified to talk about the intricacies of law school apps and finances.

Windsor (the dog) didn't write this but he WAS a Resident Tutor and career advisor at Harvard College with me, so deserves some credit.

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:38
Depending on your stats the answer could also be option C, reapply next year for >50% at Tennessee/substantial $ at other good schools (most spend their scholarship budget by June 30th), but that depends on your situation and goals
18:39
Standardized info on curves is harder to find, but this says Elon curves to a 2.67 which is downright predatory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_school_GPA_curves
appreciate it. i am well removed from undergrad and am pushing through for this year. have significant business experience and want to do corporate law and/or property. not educated on the curve and how that works, will look into that
questioning whether i go to school for free at a lesser school or pay some out of pocket at a better name for the same degree at end of the day, the numbers don't lie
18:54
@DisillusionedHomelessWalnut: The way the curve works is a below-median student at Tennessee (curves to a 3.1, so B/B+) can end up with a better GPA than an above-average student at Elon (curves to a 2.67/B-minus), so the student from Tennessee will have a better transcript *and* get better jobs on average than someone with the same class rank at Elon
18:56
Your real alarm bell is Elon's curve (linked here, p. 70 https://eloncdn.blob.core.windows.net/eu3/sites/996/2019/07/2017-2018_Academic_Catalog-and-Student_Handbook.pdf) *requires* profs to give 20% of first-year students a C-minus or worse, when the school's bar for "satisfactory academic progress" is a C+ average
ooooffff. thanks. i mean, full ride is cool and all, but damn
18:59
The only scenario where a school does something like that (curve to a 2.67, dismiss students below 2.25) is when they're admitting a lot of students who may not pass the bar, then flunking people out mercilessly so the school can keep its accreditation (ABA requires 75% of grads to pass the bar within two years, can't fail the bar if the school doesn't let you graduate)
the dean told me "no students had their scholarships reduced in the past three years, and to my recollection only one scholarship in 19 years has been reduced when a student was in good standing"
yeah, i get that and appreciate you validating that point. i like to think it really wouldn't apply to me and assume it happens due to the lower standards of admissions they utilize, but is it (full ride) worth the risk? that's the fly in the ointment
just trying to weigh all angles, seems like just biting the bullet and paying the modest amount to UTK is a smarter decision
end of cycle is for the birds, but i'm playing the hand i was dealt :)
19:06
In general you are going to be better off at a school that wants its students to succeed. UTK seems to fit the description - they are not in any danger of losing their accreditation, don't need to force people out. Elon very much does not, if their bar passage drops 2% they'll be in violation of ABA requirements so they won't give students any leway
19:06
*leeway
i appreciate your insight, friend
manifestmoreadmissions
19:11
im too lazy to provide the same level of detail as JB but I agree UTK seems like a better bet to actually achieve your career goals and set yourself up for success. I would understand being conflicted if it were like UTK vs Belmont or a lower ranked school that isn't considered predatory but because it's Elon that makes it more clear to me
thank you
the counterpoint bouncing around my head is basically "if i'm worth a damn, as i think i am, i'll be just fine no matter what the curve is" but you folks are nudging me in the direction of logic and common sense
manifestmoreadmissions
19:18
plenty of the people who fall behind are worth a damn it's just that some schools are basically set up to screw people over
yeah. fall behind as in....miss homework? can't keep up with readings? something else?
kinda nervous coming in as an untraditional guy around KJD's, billy madison vibes over here
19:21
Re: costs, it's worth looking at costs all around, both schools cost (net tuition, $0 at Elon/$30K over 3 years if you're in-state at UTK) PLUS three years not earning money or advancing in your career, which is worth 6 figures if you make decent money now. $30K in tuition is a small share of total costs in this comparison
19:24
"Fall behind" in this context means law school curves are rigid, no matter how hard everyone studies half the class will be below-median, 25% in the bottom quarter, etc. It's not super predictable either, so a student above GPA or LSAT median could still end up bottom half or 1/4 of the class
gotcha. predatory in that instance is certainly appropriate
manifestmoreadmissions
19:32
i am not kjd but im glad jb cleared that up for you lmao
19:32
And assuming similar class rank, UTK grads tend to do better in public data. Top students at UTK have a shot at biglaw (pays $225K), top students at Elon end up at small/medium firms (worse pay). Average students at UTK can get jobs at small/medium firms, average students at Elon are on the bubble for any firm job at all. Below-average students at UTK have a shot at firm jobs or other work, below-average students at Elon might not get jobs (or pass the bar, or avoid academic dismissal). That's the major advantage of well-regarded schools - more upside, less downside
manifestmoreadmissions
19:32
but yeah just reiterating that you could be worth so many damns and still not do well because its set up for that
19:37
(This is ignoring public service/government jobs, because the stats there don't tell us much about the type of job - "super competitive Department of Justice job in DC making $90K" and "local government job earning $50K" both get lumped together under the "public service" label, but say v. different things about a school's job placement
really appreciate all the insight
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.