Law School Rolling Admissions

How does it work and is it a good thing?
Tags: admissions, getting into school
Apr 2, 2023

Overview and why you might care about rolling admissions 

Nearly every ABA Accredited law school uses rolling admissions. 

Exactly how it works isn't perfectly cut and dry, but in general rolling admissions is when schools look at applications and make decisions as they come in. The school will accept (and waitlist) candidates until they have determined that they have given out as many acceptances as they are going to and then no one else will be admitted. 

Since schools like to keep their class size consistent, law schools may accept people late into the admissions cycle once accepted students have decided to go elsewhere, or if fewer great applicants than the AdCom thought would apply ended up applying late in the cycle. These acceptances typically are students who were on the waitlist.

Law schools use rolling admissions, but what does that mean?

In (most) college admissions, you have to send in all your application documents by a certain date — usually in late December or January — and the school won’t look at your application until after the deadline. If they do look at your packet before the deadline, you won’t get preferential treatment for submitting 1 month vs 1 minute early. 

With rolling admission, you can send your application over a longer time, like six months, and the school looks at applications as they get them.

Then, law schools send out their decisions about who they will accept on a rolling basis. These AdCom (admission committee) decisions typically happen in Waves. Schools will choose students until all the spots for the new class are taken. Law schools with rolling admission often start taking applications around September 1 and keep going into early in the spring term. Some schools have deadlines as early as January, and some go as late as the middle of the summer.

The Best Things About Rolling Admission

For proactive applicants, the fact that law schools use rolling admissions can be really helpful. Rolling admissions tends to benefit students who apply early in the admissions cycle. Successful applicants to top tier law schools tend to apply close to the opening date for admissions vs the deadline. 

The benefits of rolling admissions include: 

  1. You Might Have a Better Chance of Getting In
  2. You Can Send Your Law School Applications at Different Times
  3. You Can Have an Easier Last Year of School

You Might Have a Better Chance of Getting In

At least if you apply early.

While you still need a good application that meets what the law school wants, applying early in a rolling admissions cycle — when there are still a lot of open spots — can make it more likely for you to get in.

You Can Stagger Your Law School Applications

Students can use the big application period that comes with rolling admission to not have to apply to a bunch of law schools all at once. (although many do). They can plan the application process by first applying to law schools at the top of your list or those that open first, and then you can apply to the law schools later opening dates or deadlines.

By spreading out the law school application process over a few months, you'll have more time in the late summer to early winter to finish up all your applications.

You Will Hear Back Earlier than Would Otherwise be the Case

Law schools look at applications as they get them, so you'll probably get an answer about whether you got in faster than if you law schools didn’t use rolling admissions. Applying in the fall to law schools with rolling admission lets you know if you've been accepted much earlier, so you don't have to worry and wait as long. You will still have to wait. Making the wait a little easier is why we made LSData in the first place. 

Unfortunately, there is no counterfactual for this claim because all law schools use rolling admissions and some applicants will wait longer than others. 

The Worst Things About Rolling Admission

While rolling admission has some great things, students should also know about the bad things about applying to law schools with this way of doing things.

Spots Can Get Taken Fast

Because applications are looked at as they come in, students who wait until late in the application time might have a harder time getting one of the spots left. A student who can get in but waits until the last minute to apply might be more likely to not get in, so it's better to not wait too long to send in your application.

Rolling Admissions Means a lot of pressure to apply early

Some law schools with rolling admission, have important deadlines that may not even be shared. Law schools may pay more attention to students who send their applications before a certain date. 

Because of the lack of transparency around law school admissions, it is really hard to know if applying early is actually helpful, and if it is, how helpful. So the way most applicants handle the unknown is to put a lot of pressure on themselves to apply as early as possible. This pressure to apply early can make for a lot of stress around getting in apps early and trying to figure out how many times to take the LSAT when you think you can get your score up, but the application is already open. 

Related Articles

  1. How Much do Lawyers Make
  2. Law School Admissions Reddit
  3. Timeline for Applying to Law School
Windsor MIT '22, Harvard College Advisor

I am the half of LSD that didn't take the LSAT, or go to law school (Sorry about that). But I did go to MIT business school while surrounded by law students and lawyers, so I am somewhat qualified to talk about the intricacies of law school apps and finances.

Windsor (the dog) didn't write this but he WAS a Resident Tutor and career advisor at Harvard College with me, so deserves some credit.


General chat about the legal profession.
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Nah but look how red the electoral maps are
To the extent there's something behind the punditry, there's been a realignment by education - college grads now lean Dem, non-college grads GOP (see for instance the discussion here: https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-transformation-of-the-american-electorate/)- but that does not map to working class 1-to-1 unless someone wants to argue that a car dealer earning $500K a year is working class and a nonprofit caseworker earning $35,000 is not.
@KetchupOnPasta: I appreciate the concern about partying but I'm not worried
Oops, looks like the closing bracket got merged with the link. Delete that and the em-dash to get it to work
JB spreading fake news
(Some people would in fact make that case, because the nonprofit worker, or journalist, or Hill staffer, or insert your choice of educateed-but-underpaid job here, has cultural capital and/or probably lives in a wealthier *area* even if they personally are not wealthy. You be the judge of whether that fits your personal understanding of working-class)
JB I am kidding
Gotcha, just posting the rest of my wall of text
I really do not consume a news because I think it is all a little tainted. If I do, I normally synthesize a few different networks.
I don’t think working class for me is probably more an income amount more than occupation.
anyone know what I should expect if my decision just went rendered at Georgetown?
could be WL tomorrow could be A
i'll get to prayin then
Northwestern students just love ousting their administration, truly a wildcat tradition
If this story is accurate, the Dean - Revamped the hiring process and pushed out HR people that didn't like the new way - Pushed out a person whose job was Twitter - Didn't make administrators help a student rent an apartment (?!?) - Does seem to have some unhelpful micromanagement tendencies, she should work on that
That’s all
Reducing HR/marketing headcounts would be an unvarnished pro at 90% of higher ed institutions, the rental thing really is not an administrator's job when you're a large adult human, the micromanagement stuff seems bad but the headline writes some checks the reporting can't cash
If there's anything there that would give me pause before considering NU, it's the quotes from faculty (some do seem pretty upset and/or describe less-than-ideal management practices) but the framing of staffing changes in HR/marketing as some unthinkable wrong is nuts
Same with Northwesterns ousting of the football coach
You would think snitching didn’t align with the Chicago way
I will take any t14 and I will be happy
Should I send locis to every t14 saying that
Any idea what might be hurting your app? With a 3.8mid and 178 I'd expect you to have some offers (or at least waitlists rather than denials at UChicago/Michigan)
I wouldn't tell them you just want a T14. The schools want a reason you'll enroll there over their peer schools if you look competitive at both. If there is a school you would attend if admitted (other than Yale/Stanford, who assume that), that is worth putting in a LOCI.
they don't call me the waitlist collector for nothing
or at all
@jb2028: i have 2 years of retroactive withdrawls plus 3 year gap in UG after that due to a health condition. it's why I had to stop MMA
this is pretty much the app killer
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.