Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Qui tam

Read a random definition: natural liberty

A quick definition of Qui tam:

Qui tam is a legal term that means "who sues on behalf of the King as well as for himself." It's when someone brings a lawsuit against a person or company on behalf of the government. If the government wins, the person who brought the lawsuit gets a share of the money. This is called a popular action. For example, if someone defrauds the government, a person can bring a qui tam lawsuit and get a share of the money if the government wins.

A more thorough explanation:

Qui tam is a legal term that comes from Latin. It means "who sues on behalf of the King as well as for himself." In a qui tam action, a person called a relator brings a lawsuit against a person or company on behalf of the government. The government is considered the plaintiff, not the relator. If the government wins the case, the relator who brought the lawsuit gets a share of the award.

For example, the federal False Claims Act allows qui tam actions against people or companies who have cheated the government. If the relator wins the case, they can get up to 30% of the government's award. In 2009, the Supreme Court heard a case called United States ex rel Eisenstein v. City of New York, which involved a qui tam action under the False Claims Act.

Another example of a qui tam action is a whistleblower lawsuit. Whistleblowers are people who report illegal or unethical behavior by their employer. If the government investigates and finds that the employer broke the law, the whistleblower may be able to bring a qui tam action and get a share of any money the government recovers.

Overall, qui tam actions are a way for private citizens to help the government catch people who are cheating or breaking the law. They can also be a way for whistleblowers to get compensation for speaking up about wrongdoing.

Question of law | Qui tam action

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:37
people on that sub want so bad to know what they're talking about
aspiring reddit lawyers are obsessed with BL and T14. don't let it get you down.
AngryMiniCar
15:39
It's more so a reach for 100% and maybe you
I just want to make enough money to support my family and give my wife the opportunity to take time off work to raise kids (if that's what she wants, I just don't want her to feel pressure to work if she'd rather stay home). It seems like going to a strong regional school and doing well all but guarantees that life
you could post a meme and someone is bound to comment 'stats'
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:41
tbf I think it's the "doing well" that worries people; it's easy to imagine yourself doing well, but the applicant pool for law school kind of self-selects a lot of people who do well. so graduating in the top x% of your strong regional school's class is more of a crapshoot than it might seem
2.32/174/6'3"/nURM/nKJD/6.7"/2YOE/Gamer/Have a Dog
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Yes, but, not to be cocky (especialy given my GPA hahaha), the LSAT seems to be a pretty decent predictor of law school performance. If you have a higher LSAT but choose to attend a regional school with a more average median LSAT you're probably going to do well if you try hard
THE 6.7 GOODBYEEEEJHGJFGHJF
first year for sure. then here comes the CURVEEEEEEE CHOO CHOO
AngryMiniCar
15:49
LMFAOO
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:50
that's fair! although section stacking is real---that part scared me a lot when applying. the near-guarantee of good outcomes no matter where in your class you end up is, I think, what is attractive to many about the T14
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:51
at least that's why those schools were my goal, especially as a risk-averse older applicant. I have fewer years between now and retirement during which to pay off loans and then earn enough money to be able to stop working before I die lol
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:51
that said, I still find most redditors to be... ungrounded, let's say
put it into perspective: my firm is a tier 1 law firm in chicago and consistently ranked and 90% of our attorneys went to kent
also side note: i forgot law schools that aren't aba-approved exist
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:04
90% of your attorneys went to Kent, but what perfect of Kent graduates are working at your firm (or making good money, or if not, getting their loans paid off by Kent)? the latter is, I'd argue, what matters more
i'm sorry i don't quite understand what you mean
16:09
if 90% of attorneys somewhere went to kent but you employ 10 attorneys, thats only 9 attorneys out of a possible 100+ class size at kent
16:09
i think is the point they are trying to get at
OHHH THANK U
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:09
lol thanks you explained better I was typing so much. it's a classic LR logical fallacy/trick, actually
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
yeah its not
16:10
i was only responding to that one specific thing i havent scrolled up
@esoterica: THAT'S WHAT i'M SAYING THANK U!!! my point was that you will be fine where you end up ❤️
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:11
100%, that's why I think the sub is untethered to reality. but/and I was aiming for tippy top schools, and I think it's not wild to have that goal if you have reasons :)
16:11
many people have different ideas of what a good outcome would be and have even more different ideas of what amount of work they would like to put to get there
Any acceptances today?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.