Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act

Read a random definition: deductible business expense

A quick definition of Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act:

The Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act is a law that provides protection for online service providers from being held responsible for copyright infringement by their users. This law has four safe harbors that service providers can use to avoid being sued for monetary damages. These safe harbors have specific requirements that must be met, such as adopting a policy for terminating users who repeatedly infringe on copyrights and not interfering with technological measures to protect copyrighted content. The first safe harbor is for transitory digital network communications, the second is for system caching, the third is for information residing on systems of networks at the direction of users, and the fourth is for information location tools like online directories or search engines. Nonprofit educational institutions also have a special limitation on liability.

A more thorough explanation:

The Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act is a part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. It provides four safe harbors for online service providers to avoid monetary damages for copyright infringement. However, they may still face injunctions to stop future infringement.

  • Transitory digital network communications: This safe harbor applies to service providers that route messages across the internet for users. The service provider is acting as a conduit and is not liable for any infringement that may occur during the transmission.
  • System caching: This safe harbor applies to service providers that temporarily store frequently accessed web pages to minimize internet traffic. The service provider is not liable for any infringement that may occur during the storage.
  • Information residing on systems of networks at the direction of users: This safe harbor is commonly known as the "notice and takedown" provision. If a service provider is notified of infringing content, they must remove it. The user can challenge the takedown, but the content will remain offline for up to 14 days, giving the copyright owner time to file an infringement suit.
  • Information location tools: This safe harbor applies to online directories or search engines. The service provider is not liable for any infringement that may occur when providing links to infringing content.

Additionally, service providers must adopt a policy for terminating users who are repeat infringers and must not interfere with standard technological measures to protect copyrighted content.

Nonprofit educational institutions also have a special limitation on liability.

An example of the "notice and takedown" provision is when a copyright owner notifies a video-sharing website that a user has uploaded a video that infringes on their copyright. The website must remove the video, and the user can challenge the takedown. However, the video will remain offline for up to 14 days, giving the copyright owner time to file an infringement suit.

one-year rule | open adoption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:43
I got 2 weeks left of this shit and I have 0 motivation
10:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: yeah for some reason SMU isnt listed on any of the rankings lists. Been that way all year
@NemoPropheta: you only got another 40+ years of it!
@PremiumFrequentCrane Is right.
You'll forever have those days where shit ain't getting done. Just a matter of how you handle them. (IE using Chatgpt to draft a motion for leave like meeeee)
NosyBeagle
13:52
look at my lawyer dawg... im going to jail
Nah, I don't use it to do my case law. Just the actual motion drafting.
For example, I was trying to get the right language in a Motion for Sanctions (tl;dr slip and fall case, defense counsel played nothing but games – IE never sending records despite it being mandatory to trcp, producing never before seen records DURING A DEPO) and just talked to ChatGPT about his behavior to provide background to help with the drafting for the procedural paragraph.
@NosyBeagle: just makes me think of vanillamace
@TiredOfThisGrandpa: I dont have LSD+ so cant dm but will def hit you up when I have them done! Also is ur username a reference to holes? lol
Can i get accommodations for mid test 2 hour nap
I mean, i have sadhd
15:34
you could get accommodations for the schizoaffective disorder you clearly have
NosyBeagle
15:53
a two hour nap in between sections would be great for me
ronniedoeslaw
15:58
LSAT isn’t horrible you just have to lock in really hard for 2 hours and expect to be exhausted the rest of the day mentally
16:30
ugh i hit this lady w my car
16:31
well i hit her car and the cops said there's no damage but she says there is should i call my insurance what u think lawyers
real quick question. How much do early applications matter? I have super strong softs and an ok LSAT score of 160. GPA wasn't great at 3.33. I applied in late march and I have been rejected everywhere so far
16:58
late march is way too late
16:58
early doesn’t matter but before thanksgiving matters
ronniedoeslaw
16:59
Have you used the LSAC search for schools link? It helps a lot letting you know the probability of acceptance.
I mean early early might be overblown but dont apply if you are applying in march
does anyone know how many questions they typically ask for the UT recorded interview
20:21
has anyone been accepted off of the waitlist for New England yet?
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
No yet for me, I was waitlisted on Monday
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
Not *
[deleted by esoterica]
don't be a dick bro
ronniedoeslaw
14:19
Foreal
ronniedoeslaw
14:20
The name says it all lol
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.