Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

maliciously damaging the property of another

Read a random definition: joint enterprise

A quick definition of maliciously damaging the property of another:

Maliciously damaging the property of another means intentionally destroying or damaging someone else's things. It's like breaking someone's toy on purpose or drawing on their walls without permission. This is against the law and can be punished by the government. It used to be called "malicious mischief" and was a crime even in old times. Depending on how bad the damage is, it can be a small crime or a big crime. But no matter what, it's never okay to hurt someone else's things on purpose.

A more thorough explanation:

Maliciously damaging the property of another is a criminal offense that involves intentionally destroying or damaging someone else's property. This is also known as malicious mischief or criminal mischief.

For example, if someone intentionally breaks a window or spray paints graffiti on someone else's property, they could be charged with maliciously damaging the property of another.

This offense is typically considered a misdemeanor, but in some cases, it can be a felony depending on the value or nature of the property. The Model Penal Code § 220.3 outlines the specifics of this offense.

It's important to note that this offense is different from accidental damage or damage that occurs as a result of negligence. Maliciously damaging the property of another involves intentional and willful destruction or damage.

malicious assault with a deadly weapon | malicious mischief

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
FINALLY MY CYCLE IS OVER
PreviousSwelteringQuail
16:22
Is it helpful to visit a law school’s campus on the WL? (I’ll be in the city this summer anyways so it’s pretty low stakes in terms of money/travel time)
my fordham WL email has verb noun agreement errors...
16:36
tap in
ClassyPleasantHeron
16:38
@PreviousSwelteringQuail: Hard to say. Some schools don't care or aren't organized in a way that a visit translates into interest. It won't hurt your chances, and it may be worth visiting just to see if you really can picture yourself there.
17:42
@PreviousSwelteringQuail: it does not help
Ijustwannagetinman
17:46
Georgetown updated my law hub to "applicant withdrawn" but never responded to my really long kind email explaining why I had to withdraw lol
Ijustwannagetinman
17:47
that's kinda rude I mean I understand though but wow
Ijustwannagetinman
17:51
Also if anyone cares, it seems spivey was right that we will see more Wairlist movement. UCLA and UVA are the only T14 that have truly been through their waitlists and both have already taken way more students than last year at this point. Definitely something to watch!
fwiw that's how its been for every school i withdrew from, or something like "application cancelled"
Both GW and Maine did respond to my withdrawal from them. BC and OSU did not.
anyone know if pre Aug 2024 LSAT writing can still be used after Aug 2024. haven't seen anything to the contrary but...
HumorousWaggishStoat
20:50
It can -think I saw the powerscore guy confirm on a reddit thread.
I don't see why it wouldn't, except that lsac love shit like that
21:19
UCLA's waitlist volume seems similar? 10 people logged a WL -> A result last cycle, 11 people this cycle
21:20
Scratch that, exactly 10 each cycle
21:21
Although it looks like half of UCLA's waitlist As last cycle (5/10) came in June or later, so looking more closely waitlist volume does seem up for UCLA
I got an email from Emory's Office of Financial aid saying they received my aid application. The email also said "Log into OPUS, Emory's student portal, to review our online service offerings and to review your To Do activities, important messages from the Office of Financial Aid, and later in the application cycle, your aid package and disbursement dates." I haven't been accepted (I'm waitlisted), does or did everyone receive this?
nvm should have read the bottom of the email
21:50
@Ijustwannagetinman: what did you write in your email?
i wanna get off a waitlist right NEOW 🗣️
TediousBrightPossum
1:44
These waitlists are killing me
WrongTalentedSpider
2:37
Hi - wondering people's thoughts on Hofstra law. They've given me full tuition but I'd have to maintain above 50% to keep it all. The thought of it is literally making me anxious and sick
That’s Predatory i wouldnt do it
8:16
agreed, if you have other options
8:17
50% of hofstra students lose their conditional scholarships after 1L according to lawschooltransparency
makes sense if they all have some sort of scholarship lol
I would only go to a school that makes their scholarships contingent on remaining in good standing aka passing
the school i decided on has conditional schollies but only 3% lose it. to me that's essentially just staying in good standing
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.