Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

link-in-chain principle

Read a random definition: OCHAMPUS

A quick definition of link-in-chain principle:

The link-in-chain principle is a rule in criminal law that says a person accused of a crime has the right to not answer questions that might connect them to the crime. This means that they don't have to say anything that could be used as evidence against them, even if it's not directly incriminating. It's like a chain, where each piece of evidence is linked together, and the defendant has the right to not be a part of that chain.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The link-in-chain principle is a criminal procedure principle that protects a defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This principle not only protects the defendant from answering directly incriminating questions but also from giving answers that might connect the defendant to criminal activity in the chain of evidence.

Example: Suppose the police are investigating a robbery at a convenience store. During the investigation, they find a witness who saw a person matching the defendant's description leaving the store around the time of the robbery. The police then ask the defendant if they were at the convenience store on the day of the robbery. Even if the defendant did not commit the robbery, answering this question could connect them to the crime and violate their Fifth Amendment rights under the link-in-chain principle.

Explanation: The link-in-chain principle is designed to protect defendants from being indirectly incriminated by their own statements. In the example above, even if the defendant did not commit the robbery, admitting to being at the convenience store could link them to the crime and make them a suspect. By invoking their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, the defendant can avoid giving any information that might connect them to the crime.

link financing | LIP

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.