Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

immediate breach

Read a random definition: right of assembly

A quick definition of immediate breach:

An immediate breach is when someone breaks a promise they made in a contract. This can happen if they don't do what they said they would, say they won't do it, or interfere with someone else doing it. When this happens, the person who was supposed to get something from the contract can sue for damages. There are different types of breaches, like a material breach which is a big enough problem that the person can stop doing what they promised and sue for damages, or a partial breach which is a smaller problem that still allows the person to sue for damages but they still have to keep doing what they promised.

A more thorough explanation:

Immediate breach refers to a violation of a contractual obligation by failing to perform one's own promise, by repudiating it, or by interfering with another party's performance. This breach entitles the non-breaching party to sue for damages immediately.

For example, if a company hires a contractor to build a house and the contractor fails to complete the work on time or does not follow the agreed-upon specifications, it is an immediate breach. The company can sue the contractor for damages immediately.

Another example is when a tenant fails to pay rent on time. This is an immediate breach of the lease agreement, and the landlord can take legal action to recover the unpaid rent.

In summary, immediate breach is a serious violation of a contract that allows the non-breaching party to take legal action immediately to recover damages.

immediate annuity | immediate cause

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:47
I think I'm just ready to get it over with.
OvertReconditeSpider
11:47
Oh wow i did not realize you have a child. Yeah that cant be easy
11:48
Plus for my practice tests, since I have 50% extra time, I have to set aside four uninterrupted hours in order to make it a realistic practice session :')
OvertReconditeSpider
11:49
Wow
GreasyWorkablePotato
11:49
lmao
CTCSH
11:49
The key to WL success for people with literally zero self respect: https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmissions/comments/1ap9coy/i_emailed_admissions/
OvertReconditeSpider
11:50
I have adhd but opted to not take accoms because honestly id lose more focus in 4 hours and do worse than normal time imo
11:50
Yeah it's rough out here lol. The extra time is super helpful for my anxiety disorder but god practicing is a bitch
CTCSH
11:51
@ValleyH: do you have experimental removal accommodations? 50% extra on only 3 sections is like the same time as 4 sections no accommodations
11:52
I feel like I'm mostly struggling with LR, specifically N.A. and S.A. questions.
CTCSH
11:53
@OvertReconditeSpider: if i dont get my 17high in june i am going to get a adhd + anxiety diagnosis and get 100% extra time, 10 min breaks, pause/start as i please, and experimental removal. Never had to use accommodations but I know for like $300 i could grt that diagnosis and doctor sign off so fuck it, blind review 180 will be coming if i cannot make my PTs match test day again lmfao long story short, get those accommodations as alllllllllll the rich kids with 170+ love that “trade secret.” Lmfao
OvertReconditeSpider
11:53
LR was my worst section too for a while. I did every PT and by the end was able to get down to like -2 consistently some -1
OvertReconditeSpider
11:54
LR is just all about reviewing your mistakes tbh
CTCSH
11:54
All the sections are learnable. You can easily get them all to -0/-1 in like 300 hours of studying.
accommodation LSATs dont count js
OvertReconditeSpider
11:54
Try to arrive at the right answer before watching an explanation
CTCSH
11:55
They should do a three day lsat where each day is 4 sections of one type (RC/LR/LG) and get a true reading on abilities
balls123
11:55
That's hilarious
balls123
11:55
Would be way to easy
balls123
11:56
Spend less time at terror encampments and more time studying maybe then you'll get into a good school inshallah
balls123
11:56
@Hellwoods2025:
CTCSH
11:56
NA - if person does x on earth, do they need to breathe air? Does breathing air guarantee the outcome? SA - does someone need to be rich to not be homeless? Does being rich guarantee you are not homeless?
11:56
Yeah I've been doing paper practice sections and marking any questions I'm not 100% certain about with yellow tabs so I can go back and review them
11:57
and then recording any wrong answers in my error log
OvertReconditeSpider
11:57
Yeah the lsat isnt worth gaming the system to me
OvertReconditeSpider
11:57
I did just fine without accomms
11:57
I'm jealous of people who don't need them. My brain just gets so overwhelmed with anxiety on test day that everything I've learned just goes into white noise as the timer goes.
CTCSH
11:58
Lmfao that is why you are not generational wealth. Here is a saints row line that the wealthy LOVE: “i cant match your skill, so i will cheat.” Lmfao
@balls123: LMAO writing my next ps about joining Hamas
FlutteringSqueamishPuffin
11:58
hello, i just got offered a stipend from a BADly ranked school in virginia... how bad of an idea is it to go? Currently have an offer of 5k/year from a school ranked 100 in an area i would be okay with living and practicing in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.