Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

full-reporting clause

Read a random definition: title registration

A quick definition of full-reporting clause:

A full-reporting clause is a rule in an insurance policy that requires the person being insured to tell the truth about the value of what they are insuring. If they don't tell the truth, they can be punished. The clause also says that the amount of money the insurance company will pay out will be based on the value that was last reported, compared to the actual value.

A more thorough explanation:

A full-reporting clause is a term used in insurance policies that requires the insured to disclose all relevant information about the insured property or item. This clause penalizes the insured if they fail to reveal the actual value of the property or item in the policy application. It is also known as an honesty clause.

For example, if a homeowner fails to disclose that their house has a swimming pool, and the pool is damaged in a storm, the insurance company may refuse to pay for the damages because the homeowner did not disclose the pool's existence in the policy application.

Another example is when a business owner insures their inventory but fails to disclose the actual value of the inventory. If there is a fire, and the inventory is destroyed, the insurance company may only pay a portion of the claim because the insured did not report the actual value of the inventory.

The full-reporting clause is designed to ensure that the insurance company has accurate information about the insured property or item, which helps them determine the appropriate premium and coverage amount. It also protects the insurance company from fraud and misrepresentation by the insured.

full proof | full right

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
AngryMiniCar
9:21
Could be depending on those softs
Waiting on Notre Dame, Fordham, Gould, and Texas A&M.
🙏
Hurry tf up
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.