Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cumis counsel

Read a random definition: surtax exemption

A quick definition of cumis counsel:

Cumis counsel refers to an independent lawyer hired by an insurance company to represent someone who is being sued. This happens when there is a strong conflict of interest between the insurance company and the person being sued. Usually, the insurance company provides a lawyer to represent both themselves and the person being sued. But in some cases, this can create a problem because the lawyer may not be able to represent both parties fairly. Cumis counsel is hired to make sure that the person being sued has a lawyer who only represents them and not the insurance company. This helps to make sure that the person being sued gets a fair trial.

A more thorough explanation:

Cumis counsel refers to an independent attorney hired by an insurance company to represent the defendant in cases with a strong conflict of interest. This type of counsel is appointed when the insurance company and the insured have opposing interests in a legal matter.

For example, if an insurance company defends a lawsuit with a reservation of rights, they may appoint cumis counsel to represent the insured. A reservation of rights occurs when an insurance company has reason to believe that the insured's claim is not covered under the policy but decides to defend the lawsuit anyway. In this scenario, the insurance company may prioritize fact-finding and reject any settlement while reasonable suspicion of coverage exists. However, the insured may want to accept a settlement early on to resolve the case quickly. Cumis counsel helps to resolve this conflict of interest by ensuring that the insurance company cannot influence the appointed counsel to prioritize their own interests.

Cumis counsel solely represents the defendant and is not influenced by the insurance company's interests. This type of counsel is appointed to mitigate conflicts of interest in scenarios where the risk of misaligned incentives is particularly high.

cum testamento annexo | cumulative sentence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.