Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

battery

Read a random definition: rentage

A quick definition of battery:

Battery is when someone intentionally hurts or touches another person in a harmful or offensive way. This is against the law and the person who did it can be punished. If the person being hurt agreed to it or it happened during a sport or game, then it might not be considered battery. The person who did the battery might have to pay money to the person who was hurt, even if they didn't have any real damage. If the battery was really bad or done on purpose, the person who did it might have to pay even more money. Sometimes, if the person who was hurt had a special condition that made them more likely to be hurt, the person who did the battery is still responsible for what happened.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Battery is an intentional tort or a criminal offense that involves the unlawful application of force directly or indirectly upon another person or their personal belongings, causing bodily injury or offensive contact.

In tort law, battery occurs when a person intentionally causes harmful or offensive contact with another person. This means that the person acted with a desire to bring about the contact or knew that the consequence of that contact is substantially likely to occur. The contact must be of a harmful or offensive nature, which means that it causes physical impairment or injury or makes a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities feel threatened.

For example, if someone punches another person in the face, that would be considered battery because it is an intentional act that causes harmful contact. However, if the plaintiff expressly consented to such an act or gave implied consent by participating in a particular event or situation (e.g., playing sports with the defendant), they are not liable.

Even if the plaintiff doesn’t suffer actual damages, they can claim nominal damages. Thus, their proof of actual harm is not required in a battery. If a defendant acts with malice (e.g., deliberate disregard of a high probability of harm), the plaintiff may claim punitive damages. For unforeseen consequences, the defendant may still be liable under the “eggshell rule.” For instance, if the defendant punched a plaintiff who happened to have hemophilia and bled to death, he or she was liable for all damages relating to the wrongful death.

In criminal law, battery is typically merged with assault into the one crime of "assault." Battery is a general intent crime, which means that it doesn’t require a specific mens rea. The attempt of battery is assault.

To defend battery, the defendant can prove that they obtained the plaintiff’s consent or that they acted for the defense of others or in self-defense, even if the defense is only reasonable belief and not fact.

Aggravated battery is battery that involves an aggravating circumstance. Liability and sentencing for aggravated battery is typically harsher than that for battery.

The prima facie case for battery contains 4 components:

  • The defendant acts
  • The defendant intends to cause contact with the victim
  • The defendant's contact with the victim is harmful or offensive
  • The defendant's contact causes the victim to suffer a contact that is harmful or offensive

For example, if someone intentionally hits another person with a baseball bat, that would be considered battery because it meets all four components of the prima facie case. The defendant acted intentionally, intended to cause contact with the victim, the contact was harmful, and it caused the victim to suffer harm.

Batson objection | BCRA

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
NosyBeagle
13:52
look at my lawyer dawg... im going to jail
Nah, I don't use it to do my case law. Just the actual motion drafting.
For example, I was trying to get the right language in a Motion for Sanctions (tl;dr slip and fall case, defense counsel played nothing but games – IE never sending records despite it being mandatory to trcp, producing never before seen records DURING A DEPO) and just talked to ChatGPT about his behavior to provide background to help with the drafting for the procedural paragraph.
@NosyBeagle: just makes me think of vanillamace
@TiredOfThisGrandpa: I dont have LSD+ so cant dm but will def hit you up when I have them done! Also is ur username a reference to holes? lol
Can i get accommodations for mid test 2 hour nap
I mean, i have sadhd
15:34
you could get accommodations for the schizoaffective disorder you clearly have
NosyBeagle
15:53
a two hour nap in between sections would be great for me
ronniedoeslaw
15:58
LSAT isn’t horrible you just have to lock in really hard for 2 hours and expect to be exhausted the rest of the day mentally
16:30
ugh i hit this lady w my car
16:31
well i hit her car and the cops said there's no damage but she says there is should i call my insurance what u think lawyers
real quick question. How much do early applications matter? I have super strong softs and an ok LSAT score of 160. GPA wasn't great at 3.33. I applied in late march and I have been rejected everywhere so far
16:58
late march is way too late
16:58
early doesn’t matter but before thanksgiving matters
ronniedoeslaw
16:59
Have you used the LSAC search for schools link? It helps a lot letting you know the probability of acceptance.
I mean early early might be overblown but dont apply if you are applying in march
does anyone know how many questions they typically ask for the UT recorded interview
20:21
has anyone been accepted off of the waitlist for New England yet?
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
No yet for me, I was waitlisted on Monday
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
Not *
[deleted by esoterica]
don't be a dick bro
ronniedoeslaw
14:19
Foreal
ronniedoeslaw
14:20
The name says it all lol
12:58
Hello. To the gooners that have been on this site for 2+ years, you might remember me, or you might not. I was a high school freshman back then asking for advice (obvi pretty dumb at that age), and now I am a junior going to apply to colleges this summer. I had a few questions for the T14 law students here.
13:01
1. Does major matter in law school admissions? I want to go into corporate and/or IP law, so I'm thinking about majoring in Finance at some schools and Political Science at others, depending on which is stronger. I want a good job outlook in case I change my mind in the process, I'm pretty young after all. 2. To the T14 KJD admits: Give me your best advice. I want to get into T14 law schools, and similar to college admissions into undergrad, I wish I knew a lot of stuff earlier. What are some things you can tell me that can increase my chances of admission significantly?
13:03
3. How important is the undergrad program you go into? Will it help you in law school admissions and/or job placement and networking?
13:05
4. My most important question: Think back to when you were 17 (my age). If there was something you wish you knew then, what would it be? This can be anything. I don't have many people around me that go into law (everyone either goes into business or CS/engineering), so your advice is valued and highly-regarded by me.
@ParaamShinde: If you are going to go to Law School, find out and make sure you attend an undergraduate school that is on a 4.3 grade scale, not a 4.0. Regardless of what LSAC says, they do NOT weight this scale to account for schools that do not give A+ grades and thus, disadvantages applicants who are on a 4.0 scale. A very overlooked pro tip that makes a huge difference, at least today. Good luck.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.