13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
Warning
Info
Warning
Info
LSDefine
Simple English definitions for legal terms
Batson objection
Read a random definition: kill
A quick definition of Batson objection:
A Batson objection is when someone objects to the use of a peremptory challenge in a trial, claiming that the other party used it to exclude a potential juror based on their race, ethnicity, or sex. If the objection is successful, it may result in a new trial. This type of challenge was ruled unconstitutional in criminal cases by the Batson v. Kentucky case in 1986, and private litigants in civil cases can also make a Batson challenge, as seen in the Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete case in 1991.
A more thorough explanation:
A Batson objection is a legal challenge made by one party in a trial to the validity of a peremptory challenge made by the other party. This challenge is made on the grounds that the other party used the peremptory challenge to exclude a potential juror based on their race, ethnicity, or sex.
The name "Batson" comes from the case Batson v. Kentucky, which was a criminal case that held this type of peremptory challenge to be unconstitutional when used by prosecutors.
For example, if a prosecutor in a criminal trial uses a peremptory challenge to exclude a potential juror who is African American, the defense attorney may make a Batson objection, arguing that the prosecutor is excluding the juror based on their race. If the judge agrees with the objection, the prosecutor may have to select a new juror or the trial may be declared a mistrial.
It is important to note that Batson challenges can also be made in civil cases, as seen in the case Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete.