Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

acceleration clause

Read a random definition: status offender

A quick definition of acceleration clause:

An acceleration clause is a part of a loan agreement that says the borrower has to pay back the loan right away if they break the agreement in a big way. This usually happens if the borrower misses a lot of payments. The borrower has to pay back the amount they still owe, plus any interest that has built up. Sometimes, the borrower can choose to pay off the loan early to avoid paying more interest. The lender can decide whether or not to use the acceleration clause, and sometimes they can't use it if the borrower fixes the problem. Some loans also have a clause that says the borrower has to pay back the loan if they sell the property it's for. This is to make sure the lender gets their money back. Parties can sometimes agree not to use the acceleration clause, and in some cases, the borrower can fix the problem and avoid having to pay back the loan right away.

A more thorough explanation:

An acceleration clause is a term in a loan agreement that requires the borrower to pay off the loan immediately under certain conditions. This clause is typically invoked when the borrower materially breaches the loan agreement. For example, mortgages generally have an acceleration clause that is triggered if the borrower misses too many payments.

Acceleration clauses may also appear in some leases and commercial mortgages. They may also specify that the borrower may pay off the loan in full prior to the loan's maturity date.

When a lender invokes an acceleration clause, the borrower must immediately pay the unpaid balance of the loan’s principal, as well as any interest that accumulated before the lender invoked the acceleration clause. However, the borrower does not pay the full amount of interest that would have come due had the loan been paid off normally.

For example, if a borrower has a 5-year loan with an interest rate of 5%, and they pay off the loan in full after 3 years, they would only pay interest for the 3 years they had the loan, not the full 5 years.

Acceleration clauses do not always trigger automatically. Instead, after the conditions in the clause occur, the lender may choose whether to invoke the clause. If the borrower corrects their default before the lender invokes the clause, the lender may lose the right to invoke the acceleration clause.

Some mortgages have clauses called “due-on-sale” clauses that allow acceleration if the borrower sells or transfers the real property if the mortgage has not been paid in full. These clauses are intended to protect the lender’s security interest in the mortgage. Due-on-sale and due-on-transfer clauses are regulated by the federal Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982.

Home mortgage acceleration clauses are designed to trigger in situations where the mortgagee might want to foreclose on the mortgage. This allows the mortgagee to attempt to recover the entire unpaid value of the mortgage, not just the value of a few missed payments. In some jurisdictions, borrowers in this situation may undo the mortgagees’ invocation of acceleration clauses and avoid foreclosure by making up past-due payments and compensating the mortgagee for some or all the costs associated with the borrower’s default.

For example, if a borrower misses several mortgage payments, the lender may invoke the acceleration clause and demand that the borrower pay off the entire mortgage immediately. If the borrower cannot pay off the mortgage, the lender may foreclose on the property. However, in some jurisdictions, the borrower may be able to avoid foreclosure by making up the missed payments and compensating the lender for any costs associated with the default.

acceleration | acceptance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.