Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

absolute-novelty requirement

Read a random definition: refund annuity

A quick definition of absolute-novelty requirement:

The absolute-novelty requirement is a rule that says an invention must be completely new and not already known or used by others before it can be patented. This means that if someone else has already patented, described, sold, or used the invention, it is not considered new and cannot be patented. In most countries, including Canada and Mexico, the inventor must file a patent application before the invention is publicly used, sold, or disclosed. However, in the United States, the inventor has a one-year grace period to file a patent application after any public use, sale, offer of sale, or publication by the inventor or the inventor's agent.

A more thorough explanation:

The absolute-novelty requirement is a rule that an inventor must always file a patent application before the invention is publicly used, placed on sale, or disclosed. This means that the invention must be completely new and not previously known or used by anyone else.

For example, if someone invents a new type of phone charger, they must file a patent application before they start selling it or showing it to others. If they don't file the application first, they may lose the opportunity to patent their invention.

The absolute-novelty requirement is important because it ensures that only truly new and innovative inventions are granted patents. This helps to promote innovation and prevent others from unfairly profiting from someone else's ideas.

absolute novelty | absolute nuisance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
must have been some good feet
AngryMiniCar
14:04
Oriental feet prob
AngryMiniCar
14:04
Sorry that's a joke mbmb
nah it was a white girl iirc
AngryMiniCar
14:05
Must be some sexy feet
I think she was going to Vandy or nearby
AngryMiniCar
14:06
Nb she got mones for her apps and probably some mones for her tuition
AngryMiniCar
14:06
I would sell feet too but mine are chopped
One day you're selling toe pics for applications and the next you're dropping hella money on mandatory CLEs.
idk i wonder how my feet would fare in the market
is there a market for men feet?
Yes, actually.
Its crazy looking through schools acceptances seeing students who applied to like 4 schools
the balls of these people
NosyBeagle
14:11
man feet r gross
AngryMiniCar
14:11
Naw fr. But I think some people just really want those schools or will R&R
R&R?
AngryMiniCar
14:11
Which makes a lot of sense. I've seen people who only applied to 2 schools :')
AngryMiniCar
14:11
Retake and reapply
AngryMiniCar
14:12
Man
AngryMiniCar
14:13
What's it take to get accepted at Harvard or Chicago like
I'm honestly gunning for a part time program at my managing partner's alma mater. It's not a high end school, but lmao to work full time and graduate *with* a job? Can't complain.
AngryMiniCar
14:14
Ngl I was talking with my partners and the consensus is if you just wanna be a lawyer and work on cases any reputable school will be fine
AngryMiniCar
14:16
My RC is very literally not improving. Once I get that up that LSAT exam is cooked.
14:16
i think at this point ima just take the best school that gives me a full ride, too much uncertainty with loans these days
AngryMiniCar
14:17
That's valid
Exactly. One of our attorneys is a Yale undergrad/Georgetown for JD and he said that tbh, schools only matter when you're going into biglaw or other niche practice areas. I just want to do litigation (and/or appellate work) so it's not like I need to graduate from Harvard - a local school would be just fine.
NosyBeagle
14:23
@AngryMiniCar: me with LR.
NosyBeagle
14:23
once i get that up it is over for u bitches
14:26
do yall think that getting a 180 is worse than getting like a 178 or 179
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.