Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Ybarra v. Spangard

25 Cal. 2d 486 (1944)

tl;dr: Plaintiff woke up from surgery with back and neck pain but it was unclear which doctor/nurse was responsible; Court holds that RIL could still apply despite multiple Defendants and multiple potential causes of injury.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff needed an appendectomy, which was performed by Dr. Spangard....

Holding:The California Supreme Court reversed.Defendants argued that RIL doesn't apply...

Ybarra v. Spangard

Chat for Ybarra v. Spangard
brief-367
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you