🏅 Lan, SLS '24 |

Ybarra v. Spangard

25 Cal. 2d 486 (1944)

tl;dr: Plaintiff woke up from surgery with back and neck pain but it was unclear which doctor/nurse was responsible; Court holds that RIL could still apply despite multiple Defendants and multiple potential causes of injury.

Warning

Info

Ybarra v. Spangard

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff needed an appendectomy, which was performed by Dr. Spangard....

Holding:The California Supreme Court reversed.Defendants argued that RIL doesn't apply...

Ybarra v. Spangard

Help us make LSD better!