Warning
Info
- - tl;dr
- - ICRA
- - Facts & Holding
- - DeepDive
0 0
Supreme Court of the United States - 585 U.S., 128 S.Ct. 2080, 201 L.Ed.2d 403, 138 S. Ct. 1609, 200 L. Ed. 2d 775, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 201 L. Ed. 2d 775
Video Summary
DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition
The plaintiffs challenged the President's Proclamation imposing entry restrictions on certain foreign nationals from eight countries, claiming it violates provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The District Court granted a nationwide preliminary injunction that prevented the enforcement of the entry restrictions in the Proclamation. The Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision that the Proclamation exceeds the President's authority under § 1182(f) and conflicts with the INA's regulatory scheme. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether it has the authority to address the plaintiffs' statutory claims against the Proclamation under the INA. The Court assumes without deciding that the plaintiffs' statutory claims are reviewable, and proceeds on that basis. The President lawfully exercised his discretion under Section 1182(f) of the INA to suspend entry of aliens into the United States based on a worldwide, multi-agency review. The Proclamation crafted country-specific restrictions that would be most likely to encourage cooperation given each country's distinct circumstances, while securing the Nation until such time as improvements occur. The Proclamation is not subject to judicial review for policy justifications, and the President is not required to set a fixed end date for the entry restrictions. The word "class" in § 1182(f) can refer to a group of people linked by nationality, and the Proclamation does not exceed any textual limit on the President's authority. However, the lower court erred in granting a nationwide preliminary injunction.
LSD+ Case Briefs
Features
- DeepDive for detailed case analysis
- Over 50,000 existing case briefs
- Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
- Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
- Social learning with chat and high points
Over 50,000 Cases Briefed
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
14-Day Free Trial
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Integrated Legal Dictionary
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Brief anything. Instantly.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Social Learning with Chat and High Points
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Real-Time Brief Feedback
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.