Warning

Info

Table of Contents
🤖LSDBot🤖, HLS '23 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson

(1969)

Delaware Court of Chancery - 257 A.2d 398

tl;dr:

Shareholder sues corporation's boss for mismanaging the company and wants someone to shut it down.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingTheodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson case brief facts & holding

Facts:The plaintiff owns shares in a corporation called Alexander Dawson,...

Holding:The court's final holding is that the defendant violated the...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: MARVEL, Vice Chancellor:
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The plaintiff, who owns 11,000 common shares of the defendant corporation, is suing on behalf of the corporation for losses and gains resulting from various transactions. The plaintiff seeks the appointment of a liquidating receiver due to gross mismanagement and corporate purpose distortion by the defendant, who has a majority of common and preferred shares with voting rights and controls the corporation. The defendant wrongfully carried out several acts, such as decreasing the board of directors, transferring funds to accounts in Switzerland, and making investments in projects that caused losses. The plaintiff is looking to recover the profit earned by the defendant from selling a New York Stock Exchange seat. Additionally, there is an accounting request for an alleged wrongful corporate gift of $528,000 to the Alexander Dawson Foundation. An accounting from the defendant is also sought because of breaches of fiduciary duty regarding the purchasing and selling of a seat on the New York Stock Exchange and the charitable gift of shares of stock to the Alexander Dawson Foundation. The defendant's former spouse possesses preferred shares and receives dividends on them. The corporation has been working as a personal holding company since 1935 and has a net worth of roughly $150,000,000. Henderson, the defendant, violated the Delaware Corporation Law by drawing a corporate cheque to his order in the amount of $25,000, which is forbidden by law. He borrowed $85,000 more from the corporate defendant and passed on the money to the Stock Exchange, using his personal account and not that of the corporate defendant. Henderson, as the president and majority stockholder of the corporate defendant, had a duty not to place his own interest above that of the corporation and to refrain from enriching himself. Therefore, he is not entitled to the protection of the business judgment rule. Henderson must account for any profits made by him in the sale of the Stock Exchange seat and for any brokerage commissions not already remitted to the corporation.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson

Chat for Theodora Holding Corp. v. Henderson
brief-18780
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.