Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Reynolds v. Hicks

134 Wash. 2d 491 (1998)

tl;dr: Defendants' underage nephew was served alcohol at defendants' wedding and got into a car accident injuring Plaintiff; Court finds that Defendants owed no duty of care to Plaintiff.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:At Defendants Hicks' wedding, drinks were available at a hosted...

Holding:The Washington Supreme Court affirmed.The Court differentiated between social hosts...

Reynolds v. Hicks

Chat for Reynolds v. Hicks
brief-528
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you