Warning

Info

Table of Contents
ErieAndSpooky, HLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Regina v. Faulkner

(1927)

Appellate Court of Indiana - 13 Cox Crim. Cas. 550, 555, 557

tl;dr:

Man accidentally starts fire on boat while attempting to steal rum. Conviction for arson quashed because jury improperly directed.

Video Summary


Case Summary

In the 1877 case of Regina v. Faulkner, the Irish Court for Crown Cases Reserved overturned Robert Faulkner's conviction for arson after he accidentally set a cargo ship on fire while attempting to steal rum. The case demonstrated that the intention to commit one crime does not automatically extend to any unintended consequences.

Faulkner, a seaman, broke into the ship's storage and drilled a hole in a rum cask. When the rum spilled, he lit a match to see better and accidentally dropped it in the cask, causing a fire that destroyed the ship. While he was convicted of theft and arson, Faulkner appealed the arson charge.

The court ruled that Faulkner couldn't be guilty of arson unless he intentionally set the ship ablaze or was reckless concerning the fire's potential. The judges argued that there was no direct link between his intention to steal and the accidental fire, and that lighting a match wasn't inherently dangerous or unlawful. Additionally, the court rejected the idea that Faulkner's theft made him responsible for any ensuing harm, noting that this approach only applied to homicide cases under common law. The case is significant because it clarified the concept of transferred malice and restricted the range of felony murder.

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Regina v. Faulkner

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Regina v. Faulkner case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingRegina v. Faulkner case brief facts & holding

Facts:Faulkner (defendant), a sailor, went to the hold of the...

Holding:To constitute an offense under the Malicious Injuries to Property...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Regina v. Faulkner case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Regina v. Faulkner | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Remy, J.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The State of Indiana contracted for a year's supply of coal for a penal institution at a price of $3.40 per ton. A railway company delivered a carload of coal of the same kind and quality to the prison by mistake, which was consumed. The railway company sued the state to recover the market value of the coal, which was $6.85 per ton, but the court limited recovery to the contract price. The railway company is appealing the decision. The state's obligation to pay is quasi-contractual, and it must make restitution in value for the benefit received. The nature of the action is unusual and requires further consideration.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Regina v. Faulkner case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Regina v. Faulkner case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Regina v. Faulkner

Chat for Regina v. Faulkner
brief-333
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.