tl;dr: Two parties agreed on a down payment for a tract of land. Then, one of them backed out of the deal. The other sued, claiming that there was no mutuality of obligation because of a "satisfaction clause" in their original agreement.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Mattei (Plaintiff) is a real estate developer who wanted to...
Holding:Reversed. Plaintiff formed an agreement with Defendant based on mutuality...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
I am still kind of biased toward the Clifton Forge area so that I can live with my girlfriend, but am definitely starting to consider places around lexington out of necessity\