Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Lowy v. United Pacific Insurance Co.

67 Cal. 2d 87 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 1967)

Tags:ย Contracts, Divisibil

tl;dr: An excavation company was hired by Plaintiff to do grading, as well as some paving and street improvements. After 98% of the work was done, the company stopped because of an issue with payment for additional work.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant excavation company was hired by Plaintiff to do grading,...

Holding:Affirmed. A contract is divisible where by its terms (1)...

Lowy v. United Pacific Insurance Co.

Chat for Lowy v. United Pacific Insurance Co.
brief-231
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you