Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Dodson v. Shrader

824 S.W.2d 545 (Sup. Ct. Tenn. 1992)

tl;dr: An infant purchased a car without misrepresenting his age. But then the car broke down and he invoked the infancy doctrine to try and get his money back. Defendant refused to accept the broken-down car and did not refund the infant.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Dodson, a minor, purchased a pickup truck from Defendant...

Holding:Remanded. If there was no overreach or undue influence of...

Dodson v. Shrader

Chat for Dodson v. Shrader
brief-175
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you