Warning

Info

🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris

157 N.E.2d 597 (1959)

tl;dr: The plaintiff claimed they were induced into a contract with the defendants through oral misrepresentations. The defendants were not held liable for fraud because the contract explicitly stated that neither party relied on any outside representations.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Danann Realty Corp. (plaintiff) alleged that they were induced into...

Holding:If this were a general or vague merger clause, then...

Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris

Chat for Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris
brief-51
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you