Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

72 N.J.Eq. 831 (Court of Chancery of New Jersey, 1907)

tl;dr: A cannery needs a shipment of tomatoes and gets an order for specific performance of their contract to buy tomatoes because there is no other equitable remedy available.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Catts agreed to sell tomatoes to Plaintiff Curtice Brothers...

Holding:Specific performance was granted, enjoining Catts to fulfill their end...

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

Chat for Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts
brief-122
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you