🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

72 N.J.Eq. 831 (Court of Chancery of New Jersey, 1907)

tl;dr: A cannery needs a shipment of tomatoes and gets an order for specific performance of their contract to buy tomatoes because there is no other equitable remedy available.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Catts agreed to sell tomatoes to Plaintiff Curtice Brothers...

Holding:Specific performance was granted, enjoining Catts to fulfill their end...

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

Chat for Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

Brief General >T14 Big mad

Warning

Info

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Catts agreed to sell tomatoes to Plaintiff Curtice Brothers...

Holding:Specific performance was granted, enjoining Catts to fulfill their end...

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

Help us make LSD better!