🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

72 N.J.Eq. 831 (Court of Chancery of New Jersey, 1907)

tl;dr: A cannery needs a shipment of tomatoes and gets an order for specific performance of their contract to buy tomatoes because there is no other equitable remedy available.

Warning

Info

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Catts agreed to sell tomatoes to Plaintiff Curtice Brothers...

Holding:Specific performance was granted, enjoining Catts to fulfill their end...

Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts

Help us make LSD better!