Warning
Info
- - tl;dr
- - ICRA
- - Facts & Holding
- - DeepDive
0 0
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - 789 F.2d 589
Tags: Civil Procedure, Res Judicata
tl;dr:
This case demonstrates res judicata barring a claim that had been validly previously litigated.Video Summary
Case Summary
In the 1986 case Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the legal concept of res judicata, or claim preclusion, under Rule 13 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Car Carriers, a transport company working with Ford, accused Ford and another carrier, Nu-Car, of breaking antitrust and state laws. They claimed that Ford misled them with false promises of increased business and rates, only to terminate their contracts and prevent growth. Car Carriers also alleged that Ford colluded with Nu-Car to submit lowball bids in a predatory strategy.
After an initial lawsuit filed in 1982 was dismissed by the district court, Car Carriers filed a second suit in 1983, presenting new federal claims and again asserting state law claims. However, the district court dismissed this second lawsuit based on res judicata, reasoning that it involved the same facts as the first case. The Court of Appeals agreed and upheld the dismissal.
The court utilized a test based on the "identity of claims" and found that the second suit stemmed from the same contractual relationship and alleged injuries as the first. The fact that different legal theories or injuries were presented did not matter, since the main focus was on the connection between the claims. The ruling reinforced the principles of res judicata, claim preclusion, and federalism, emphasizing the need for finality and efficiency in litigation. This case continues to serve as an important reference on the subject.
DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition
The court upheld the district court's decision that a current lawsuit against Ford and Nu-Car was barred by res judicata due to a previous lawsuit accusing them of conspiring in violation of the Sherman Act, which lacked the necessary harm to be compensated and was dismissed with prejudice. The current lawsuit, consisting of twenty-four counts, including RICO violations, a violation of the Interstate Commerce Act, and violations of Illinois law, was dismissed without prejudice as the federal claims were barred by res judicata. The 1982 Complaint alleged that Car Carriers accused Ford of engaging in anti-competitive behavior by employing a method to eliminate target carriers, which involved promising increased traffic and agreement with increased tariff rates, but then preventing them from obtaining the necessary rate increases for profitable operations. Car Carriers claimed that its demise followed this pattern.
LSD+ Case Briefs
Features
- DeepDive for detailed case analysis
- Over 50,000 existing case briefs
- Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
- Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
- Social learning with chat and high points
Over 50,000 Cases Briefed
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
14-Day Free Trial
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Integrated Legal Dictionary
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Brief anything. Instantly.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Social Learning with Chat and High Points
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Real-Time Brief Feedback
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.