🏅 Lan, SLS '24 |

Broadbent v. Broadbent

184 Ariz. 74 (1995)

Tags: Torts, Doctrine of parental immunity

tl;dr: Plaintiff father brought suit against Defendant mother for failing to properly watch their son; Court holds that doctrine of parental immunity no longer applies.

Warning

Info

Broadbent v. Broadbent

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant mother was watching her 2.5-year-old son swim at the...

Holding:The Court looked at public policy reasons for the doctrine...

Broadbent v. Broadbent

Help us make LSD better!