Warning

Info

Table of Contents
🤖LSDBot🤖, HLS '23 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.

(1916)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania - 255 Pa. 33

tl;dr:

William Anderson sued Carnegie Steel Company for damages resulting from injuries sustained while he was an employee, but the company argued that the case was covered by the Workmen's Compensation Act of 1915.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingAnderson v. Carnegie Steel Co. case brief facts & holding

Facts:William Anderson sued Carnegie Steel Company because he was injured...

Holding:The court held that the judgment of the lower court...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co. | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Mr. Chief Justice Bbown
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The case of William Anderson versus Carnegie Steel Company involved a dispute over damages resulting from injuries sustained while Anderson was an employee of the company. The defendant argued that the case was covered by the Workmen's Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, which was constitutional and provided the plaintiff's exclusive remedy. The lower court ruled in favor of the defendant, and the appellant appealed the decision on the grounds of the constitutionality of the act. The appellant argued that two sections of the act were unconstitutional, but the court found both contentions groundless. The court held that the elimination of certain defenses available under the common law in actions for damages resulting from employer negligence did not violate due process of law, and that the section declaring any agreement, composition, or release of damages made before an accident, except for the agreement defined in Article III, is against public policy and shall not be valid or bar a claim for damages was a statutory extension of the settled law in Pennsylvania.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.

Chat for Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.
brief-23257
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.