Warning

Info

TrickyTabooPadawon
Class of 2025
First choice school:
3.95/4.3
GPA
153/180
LSAT
User stats
Softs
T3
URM
Work
?
Goal
-
Apps submitted
0
Scholarships Received
$0
TrickyTabooPadawon's wisdom for future generations

School apps

Rank
2021-2022
Result App type FW Resident Schol... Sent Sent raw Received Received raw Complete Complete raw UR UR raw UR2 UR2 raw II II raw Decision Decision raw
8 Columbia University Waitlisted RDregular decision Apr 26 2024-04-26
15 Georgetown University Waitlisted RDregular decision
84 Loyola University—Ch... Waitlisted RDregular decision
5 New York University Rejected RDregular decision Apr 29 2024-04-29
10 Northwestern University Waitlisted RDregular decision Apr 11 2024-04-11
10 UCBerkeley Rejected RDregular decision Mar 09 2024-03-09
14 UCLos Angeles Waitlisted RDregular decision
3 UChicago Rejected RDregular decision Mar 07 2024-03-07
43 UIllinois—Urbana Cha... Accepted RDregular decision Dec 31 2023-12-31 Feb 23 2024-02-23
27 UNotre Dame Pending RDregular decision
4 UPennsylvania Waitlisted RDregular decision

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:04
I just got an offer off the BU WL
trees1234567
14:05
hugeeeee
That's probably where I'm going to go
congrats! any money?
trees1234567
14:05
congrats @tarzacc
im just saying its only wild to me if it IS a plus
TheFriendlyLorax
14:05
I think it’s more about the marginalization they can face as a result and how it can inform their perspective, but I digress
14:05
thank you I'm honestly still kinda rattled because this blows up everything ive planned so far. They offered 15k a year which isnt a lot but not nothing
TheFriendlyLorax
14:05
Congrats!!!
yah, why would decades of discrimination need to be addressed in a substantive way thats so crazy, its not like that was something that in that past would have been considered a negative to an application or anything (like classy heron said, context more than a plus)
actually i think it's useful to ensure a class is the optimal level of gay
14:06
looool
sorry that was such a rude way to say it
i was being a shit and not serious i didn't intend offense
im just saying in the sense that if u like to fuck butthole instead of vagina or vice versa you could be higher ranked in a holistic soft tier type of way
not denying the existince of homophobia in the past lmao
ClassyPleasantHeron
14:08
Of course, glove. "Just asking questions." (◔_◔)
14:08
The "soft tiers" in the form described here are not used by any admissions office, they're based on a reddit post that the author themselves cautions is a very broad way to think about this stuff
its literally just try hards trying to come up with new ways of saying who has a strong resume and who doesn't
literally all a resume is is demonstrating your ability to bullshit to make yourself seem impressive
But I wonder whether there are better ways to address discrimination than to give people who are members of groups that have been discriminated against a boost in admissions to law schools on that basis.
Not saying there is. I just wonder...
i mean at this point its human nature to discrimate against people who don't fit the standard
what even is the standard anymore?
14:11
I don't think there's a particularly strong case for affirmative action for LGBTQ people in the way there is for affirmative action based on (e.g.) race or first-gen status, you aren't really "born into" being LGBTQ in a way that runs in a family, lines up with geographic inequality (redlining, underfunded schools), etc. But that's not how schools factor LGBTQ status into their admissions anyway.
unless u have the gay gene jb
of course there are, but its not one or the other. These identites have historically been discriminated against in academia, and while overt forms are less common today, its still true that covert implicit bias still exists. Affirmative action is a safeguard against that. and i personally think its very important, but ill leave it at that. Tis my opinion
14:12
It's more of a "this is something about a person that might be tied to disadvantages they've overcome, goals they have within the law, etc. in a way that's not super common and thus valued by schools"
I agree overcoming discrimination of various forms is important. But there are other values, too. And when the value of overcoming discrimination clashes with other values, it's not always obvious the former should win. But 'tis just my opinion.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.