Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

The Bluebook

Read a random definition: ex defectu juris

A quick definition of The Bluebook:

The Bluebook is a guide that tells people how to write down where they found information in legal documents. It is used by law students and professionals in the United States. The Bluebook was made by four law journals and was first published in 1926. It is updated often and has a blue cover. Other groups also have their own ways of writing down where they found information in legal documents.

A more thorough explanation:

The Bluebook

The Bluebook is a guide that explains how to cite legal documents in the United States. It is used by law students and professionals to make sure their citations are accurate and consistent. The Bluebook was first published in 1926 and is regularly updated. It is named after the color of its cover.

When writing a legal memo, a lawyer might use The Bluebook to cite a court case like this:

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

This citation includes the name of the case, the volume and page number of the book where it can be found, and the year it was decided. Using The Bluebook ensures that the citation is formatted correctly and can be easily understood by other legal professionals.

Another example of a citation using The Bluebook might look like this:

John Doe, The History of Legal Citation (2d ed. 2010).

This citation includes the author's name, the title of the book, the edition, and the year it was published. Again, using The Bluebook helps to ensure that the citation is accurate and consistent with other legal documents.

These examples illustrate how The Bluebook is used to create citations that are clear, consistent, and easy to understand. By following the guidelines set forth in The Bluebook, legal professionals can ensure that their work is of the highest quality and meets the standards of the legal profession.

TFRP | The Canadian Legal Context: PIPEDA, Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications, and the Competition Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:25
Hi llama!!
21:15
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: How are you!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
tbh kinda losing my mind, I'm visiting my parents in my childhood home and whenever I do this I remember why I never do this aahhaha
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
My dog likes it here tho
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
How are youuuuu?
22:26
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Deep/tough. Feels. Im well working on a project so im happy :)
22:28
should i hit the dmt pen in the sauna and meet god
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
Ooh what kind of project? Work, passion, neither, both?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
@NemoPropheta: do it do it
22:37
alright day before my lsat ill hit a blinker in the sauna and become one with the test
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.