Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

tender back rule

Read a random definition: coprincipal

A quick definition of tender back rule:

The tender-back rule is a legal rule that applies to agreements between employers and employees. If an employee accepts a severance package or other benefits from their employer in exchange for waiving their right to sue the employer, the employee must return those benefits if they decide to sue. This rule is meant to prevent employees from taking the benefits and then trying to get more money through a lawsuit. However, there are some types of claims, like those related to discrimination, where the rule does not apply.

A more thorough explanation:

The tender-back rule is a legal principle that applies to waiver or release agreements in an employment context. It requires an employee to return any consideration received from an employer if they wish to litigate any issue that was supposedly waived.

An employer offers a severance package to an employee with an agreement stating that acceptance of the package waives all of the employee's rights to future claims against the employer. If the employee decides to sue the employer for a claim that was supposedly waived, they must return the severance amount received before commencing the lawsuit.

The tender-back rule is commonly used as a defense by employers to prevent employees from taking the benefit of the agreement and then pursuing additional compensation through litigation. The rule imposes an obligation on potential plaintiffs to return any consideration received before commencing any claim or counterclaim.

However, the tender-back rule does not apply to all claims. For example, claims brought under the Equal Pay Act (EPA), Title VII, and Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) do not trigger the tender-back rule, and plaintiffs asserting violations of these acts do not have to return any consideration to commence litigation.

In summary, the tender-back rule requires an employee to return any consideration received from an employer if they wish to litigate any issue that was supposedly waived.

tender | tender offer

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:23
sorry im coping
17:23
i have not heard back from a single school
have you tried looking at your status checkers?
17:24
alll I do is stare at stus checkers and I have lost allllll social cues
ohhhh then you should try reloading ur email
that helps too
17:25
I like it when the schools edge me and send me a false positive
17:25
i get sad that the wait is over
17:25
but then happy when they tell me it was an accident
flooding their email with messages always works too
17:27
Im fasting, no water for me
vandy wave today??
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:03
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: 14 people marked that they were accepted today
seems like theyre running low on As..
18:10
SMU WL wave
18:10
I missed it
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:12
@MrThickRopes: 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Woot woot!
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:13
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: saw this on Reddit today. A guesstimate on how many As are left in the T100
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:14
The person who had been posting them on Reddit for awhile was hired by Spivey to do it for them
Got in to SMU last week. Reapplicant, 174 LSAT 3.71 UGPA 3.92 Graduate GPA, 2 Years work as a consultant. Dean's Scholarship. Should I ask for reconsideration?
wombocombo
19:21
@ChampionofThraben: wait and see if you get other offers to counter with. Otherwise you're just begging basically
Have a full ride from UofR to counter with, not sure they are near peer enough
What is the best law school I can go to with 3.17 GPA and 166 LSAT (I scored 177 but the average is 166 because I scored a 154 also)
Law schools generally consider the highest score rather than average unless they specifically state the latter.
That is amazing, what about someone with a finding of misconduct and irregularity of faking a transcript? Can someone even be a lawyer with a misconduct and irregularity? I think yes because there are people who have criminal records and are lawyers, but faking a transcript? The ones I found are people with drug charges but not faking a transcript
23:23
Sounds like you faked a transcript?
did i seriously miss another bc wave? applied mid november
I’m not gonna get in anywhere
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.