Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

substantial-continuity doctrine

Read a random definition: blue chip

A quick definition of substantial-continuity doctrine:

The substantial-continuity doctrine is a rule that says if a new company takes over another company and continues to do the same business, with the same employees, doing the same jobs, for the same bosses, under the same working conditions, and using the same production methods to make the same products for the same customers, then the new company can be held responsible for the old company's actions. This is also called the continuity-of-enterprise doctrine. It is different from the mere-continuation doctrine.

A more thorough explanation:

The substantial-continuity doctrine is a principle that holds a successor corporation responsible for the actions of its predecessor corporation if the successor continues the same business as the predecessor. This means that if the successor corporation maintains the same employees, supervisors, working conditions, production processes, and customers as the predecessor, it can be held liable for any legal issues that the predecessor faced.

For example, if Company A sells its business to Company B, and Company B continues to produce the same products, using the same employees, supervisors, and production processes, then Company B can be held responsible for any legal issues that Company A faced. This is because Company B has continued the same business as Company A, and therefore, has inherited its legal responsibilities.

The substantial-continuity doctrine is different from the mere-continuation doctrine, which only holds a successor corporation responsible if it is a mere continuation of the predecessor corporation, without any substantial changes to the business.

substantial-compliance rule | substantial equivalent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
AngryMiniCar
9:21
Could be depending on those softs
Waiting on Notre Dame, Fordham, Gould, and Texas A&M.
🙏
Hurry tf up
10:05
coworker watching insta reels at full volume i’m boutta crash the fuck out
10:05
That one coworker thats just gotta go. God hes ready. God take him please god
AngryMiniCar
10:13
That's insane
10:25
Ruminating on how if you have a job you love it’s really chic and charming to refuse to retire but if you have a job you hate but can’t retire you are a cautionary tale on why you need to start saving at an early age
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
10:25
Take him *to a desk outside of earshot
NosyBeagle
10:55
who up lsd'ng their law rn
GOOD MORNING LSD LAWWWWWWWWWWW
HOW ARE WE TODAY
11:21
Indecisive, groggy, and agitated wby
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.