Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Statute of Allegiance de Facto

Read a random definition: governing document

A quick definition of Statute of Allegiance de Facto:

Statute of Allegiance de Facto: A law that required people to pledge loyalty to the current king or queen, even if they were not the rightful ruler. This law protected people who followed the de facto monarch and punished those who supported the de jure monarch. It was passed during the reign of King Henry VII in England.

A more thorough explanation:

The Statute of Allegiance de Facto was a law that required subjects to pledge their loyalty to the current (de facto) king or ruler, and protected them from any consequences for doing so. This law was enacted during the reign of King Henry VII in England, in the year 1495.

For example, if a new king had taken the throne by force or through other means that were not entirely legitimate, the Statute of Allegiance de Facto would require all subjects to swear allegiance to that king, even if they did not necessarily agree with his claim to the throne. By doing so, they would be protected from any punishment or retribution for their loyalty.

This law was important in maintaining stability and order during times of political upheaval or uncertainty, as it ensured that the people would remain loyal to the current ruler, regardless of how they came to power. It also helped to prevent civil unrest or rebellion, as those who swore allegiance to the de facto king were legally protected from any consequences for doing so.

Statute of Accumulations | Statute of Amendments and Jeofails

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:23
sorry im coping
17:23
i have not heard back from a single school
have you tried looking at your status checkers?
17:24
alll I do is stare at stus checkers and I have lost allllll social cues
ohhhh then you should try reloading ur email
that helps too
17:25
I like it when the schools edge me and send me a false positive
17:25
i get sad that the wait is over
17:25
but then happy when they tell me it was an accident
flooding their email with messages always works too
17:27
Im fasting, no water for me
vandy wave today??
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:03
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: 14 people marked that they were accepted today
seems like theyre running low on As..
18:10
SMU WL wave
18:10
I missed it
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:12
@MrThickRopes: 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Woot woot!
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:13
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: saw this on Reddit today. A guesstimate on how many As are left in the T100
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:14
The person who had been posting them on Reddit for awhile was hired by Spivey to do it for them
Got in to SMU last week. Reapplicant, 174 LSAT 3.71 UGPA 3.92 Graduate GPA, 2 Years work as a consultant. Dean's Scholarship. Should I ask for reconsideration?
wombocombo
19:21
@ChampionofThraben: wait and see if you get other offers to counter with. Otherwise you're just begging basically
Have a full ride from UofR to counter with, not sure they are near peer enough
What is the best law school I can go to with 3.17 GPA and 166 LSAT (I scored 177 but the average is 166 because I scored a 154 also)
Law schools generally consider the highest score rather than average unless they specifically state the latter.
That is amazing, what about someone with a finding of misconduct and irregularity of faking a transcript? Can someone even be a lawyer with a misconduct and irregularity? I think yes because there are people who have criminal records and are lawyers, but faking a transcript? The ones I found are people with drug charges but not faking a transcript
23:23
Sounds like you faked a transcript?
did i seriously miss another bc wave? applied mid november
I’m not gonna get in anywhere
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.