Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

stare decisis et non quieta movere

Read a random definition: Commander in Chief powers

A quick definition of stare decisis et non quieta movere:

Stare decisis et non quieta movere: This is a Latin phrase that means to stand by things that have already been decided and not to change them. It is a rule that says when a court makes a decision about something, other courts should follow that decision when they have a similar case. This is called the doctrine of precedent. It helps to keep things fair and consistent. Only in special cases should a court change a decision that has already been made.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Stare decisis et non quieta movere is a Latin phrase that means "to stand by things decided, and not to disturb settled points." It refers to the doctrine of precedent, which requires courts to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation.

Example: Let's say a court has previously ruled that a particular law is unconstitutional. If a similar case comes before the court, it must follow the earlier decision and declare the law unconstitutional, unless there are urgent reasons and exceptional circumstances that justify a new ruling.

This principle is important because it promotes consistency and predictability in the legal system. It ensures that similar cases are treated in a similar manner, and that the law is applied fairly and impartially.

Star Chamber | stare enim religioni debet

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:36
that would be more interesting
NosyBeagle
10:38
@NemoPropheta: LSAT haters unite. This test sucks butt
10:43
I got 2 weeks left of this shit and I have 0 motivation
10:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: yeah for some reason SMU isnt listed on any of the rankings lists. Been that way all year
@NemoPropheta: you only got another 40+ years of it!
@PremiumFrequentCrane Is right.
You'll forever have those days where shit ain't getting done. Just a matter of how you handle them. (IE using Chatgpt to draft a motion for leave like meeeee)
NosyBeagle
13:52
look at my lawyer dawg... im going to jail
Nah, I don't use it to do my case law. Just the actual motion drafting.
For example, I was trying to get the right language in a Motion for Sanctions (tl;dr slip and fall case, defense counsel played nothing but games – IE never sending records despite it being mandatory to trcp, producing never before seen records DURING A DEPO) and just talked to ChatGPT about his behavior to provide background to help with the drafting for the procedural paragraph.
@NosyBeagle: just makes me think of vanillamace
@TiredOfThisGrandpa: I dont have LSD+ so cant dm but will def hit you up when I have them done! Also is ur username a reference to holes? lol
Can i get accommodations for mid test 2 hour nap
I mean, i have sadhd
15:34
you could get accommodations for the schizoaffective disorder you clearly have
NosyBeagle
15:53
a two hour nap in between sections would be great for me
ronniedoeslaw
15:58
LSAT isn’t horrible you just have to lock in really hard for 2 hours and expect to be exhausted the rest of the day mentally
16:30
ugh i hit this lady w my car
16:31
well i hit her car and the cops said there's no damage but she says there is should i call my insurance what u think lawyers
real quick question. How much do early applications matter? I have super strong softs and an ok LSAT score of 160. GPA wasn't great at 3.33. I applied in late march and I have been rejected everywhere so far
16:58
late march is way too late
16:58
early doesn’t matter but before thanksgiving matters
ronniedoeslaw
16:59
Have you used the LSAC search for schools link? It helps a lot letting you know the probability of acceptance.
I mean early early might be overblown but dont apply if you are applying in march
does anyone know how many questions they typically ask for the UT recorded interview
20:21
has anyone been accepted off of the waitlist for New England yet?
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
No yet for me, I was waitlisted on Monday
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
Not *
@Callmylawyer: I feel really bad for you. I feel really sad that you are asking that.
don't be a dick bro
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.