Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

simple-tool rule

Read a random definition: affectus

A quick definition of simple-tool rule:

Simple-Tool Rule: This means that if you are working with a tool and you know it is broken or dangerous, your employer does not have to warn you about it. It is your responsibility to make sure the tool is safe to use. Your employer also does not have to check the tool if it is only used by you and you know how to use it properly.

A more thorough explanation:

The simple-tool rule is a principle that states that an employer is not responsible for warning their employees about obvious dangers. Additionally, the employer is not required to inspect a tool that is under the complete control of an employee who is fully aware of the tool's condition.

For example, if an employee is using a hammer to drive a nail into a piece of wood, the employer does not need to warn the employee about the potential danger of hitting their finger with the hammer. This danger is obvious to anyone who has used a hammer before. Similarly, if the employee is using a saw that they have used many times before and are familiar with its condition, the employer does not need to inspect the saw.

Another example could be a construction worker who is using a ladder to reach a high place. If the ladder is in good condition and the worker has used it before, the employer does not need to inspect the ladder or warn the worker about the potential danger of falling.

The simple-tool rule is based on the assumption that employees are responsible for their own safety when using tools that they are familiar with. Employers are only responsible for providing safe tools and equipment and ensuring that employees are properly trained to use them.

simple state | simplex

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.