!-- Google Tag Manager (noscript) -->

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

 
LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

property crimes

Read a random definition: alpha subclass

A quick definition of property crimes:

Property crimes are criminal acts where someone tries to take something that doesn't belong to them or damage someone else's property without using force. This includes things like stealing, breaking into someone's home, or setting fire to a building. Even though property crimes don't involve physical harm to people, they can still cause a lot of damage and hurt.

A more thorough explanation:

Property crimes are criminal offenses where the perpetrator tries to gain an unlawful benefit or cause damage to someone else's property without using force or threatening to use force. Examples of property crimes include:

  • Burglary: Breaking into someone's home or business to steal something.
  • Theft: Taking someone else's property without their permission.
  • Arson: Setting fire to someone else's property.

These crimes are called property crimes because they involve taking or damaging someone else's property. Even though arson can result in injury or death, it is still considered a property crime because the primary goal is to damage the property.

These examples illustrate the definition of property crimes because they all involve taking or damaging someone else's property without using force or threatening to use force. The perpetrator is trying to gain something for themselves or cause harm to someone else's property without physically harming anyone.

property, law of | property dividend

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
[] baddestbunny
19:57
With respect to graduate or professional school, are you or will you be in the first generation of (i) your immediate family, or (ii) the household(s) in which you grew up, to graduate from such a school?
[] baddestbunny
19:58
sorry that's not the question
1a2b3c4d26z
19:58
nope
[] baddestbunny
19:58
do you think non-custodial parent counts here?
[] baddestbunny
19:58
like they are immediate family but I didn't grow up with them
1a2b3c4d26z
19:58
Sure yea
Hmm. If this Q is on a law school application it depends on what constitutes immediate family.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:58
Feel like that's an inclusive or
[] baddestbunny
19:59
yeah I was trying to decide if it was meant to be inclusive
Oh wait the second part is household you grew up in. So, I think the answer would be yes.
[] baddestbunny
19:59
like my answer is no to the first one, yes to the second one
1a2b3c4d26z
19:59
I don't think a) anyone will find out whether you consider it inclusive nor b) care
1a2b3c4d26z
19:59
so go for it
1a2b3c4d26z
19:59
Not legal advice
[] baddestbunny
19:59
haha
windyMagician
20:03
i would say yes, if they wanted it to be inclusive they should have said and/or
windyMagician
20:04
this is like an lr question
[] baddestbunny
20:04
the or was italicized originally if that helps at all
1a2b3c4d26z
20:05
Then it's totally inclusive
[] baddestbunny
20:06
see that's what UVA says
[] baddestbunny
20:06
Duke says: Will you be a first-generation professional student (i.e., none of your parent(s) or the people who raised you have a degree beyond the bachelor's level)?
[] baddestbunny
20:07
so my answer to that I think is no
[] baddestbunny
20:07
but it's all so complicated
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
No bergly yet again :(
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
20:10
borkley is giving me major blue balls rn
KnowledgeableGaudyMillipede
20:10
borgley
windyMagician
20:10
how does italicizing the or make it inclusive?
KnowledgeableGaudyMillipede
20:10
buckley
1a2b3c4d26z
20:11
@windyMagician: vibes
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.