Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

proclamation of exigents

Read a random definition: silver certificates

A quick definition of proclamation of exigents:

A proclamation of exigents is a historical practice where the sheriff would repeatedly announce that a person in the county was about to be outlawed. This was done through a judicial writ called an exigent, which required the defendant to appear in court to answer the plaintiff's action. If the defendant did not appear, they would be outlawed. Exigents were used in urgent situations that required immediate action or aid.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Proclamation of exigents refers to the repeated proclamations made by the sheriff of an imminent outlawing of a person in the county where the person lived. It is a historical term that was used in the process of outlawry.

Exigent: The term "exigent" refers to something that requires immediate action or aid. For example, if someone is drowning, it is an exigent situation that requires immediate help.

Exigent (historical): In the historical context, "exigent" was a judicial writ used in the process of outlawry. It commanded the sheriff to demand the defendant's appearance, from county court to county court, until he was outlawed. If the defendant appeared, the sheriff was to take him before the court to answer the plaintiff's action.

Example: Let's say that John was accused of a crime and was required to appear in court. However, John refused to appear in court, and the sheriff was unable to locate him. In such a case, the sheriff would issue a proclamation of exigents, which would require John to appear in court. If John still refused to appear, he would be outlawed.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the proclamation of exigents was used in the process of outlawry. If a defendant refused to appear in court, the sheriff would issue a proclamation of exigents, which would require the defendant to appear in court. If the defendant still refused to appear, he would be outlawed.

procès-verbal | proclamation of rebellion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
I appreciate ya
18:34
u guys know who’s really easy to shit on? cops
18:34
they’re not even in it for the free college
AngryMiniCar
19:25
yk who's easier to shit on? Donald and Musk
AngryMiniCar
19:25
They're divorcing rn
20:09
wow you guys really argued hard against that brick wall
20:11
Im sure many Nazis also joined for the money and stability, but you know as long as you’re “just following orders” yeah its the systems problem sure you’re totally absolved of perpetuating such a system
20:42
dude didn’t u say u were working for a defense contractor or something?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:43
I think I'm mostly aligned with you/your views on this issue, nemo, but I don't see how being mean in a chat is going to change hearts and minds idk
20:44
I think there’s a place to acknowledge both that the military is an institution that preys on low income people and you should never have to see ur best friend die in front of you while also believing that we’ve engaged in a lot of meaningless wars and if you’ve participated you are complicit
20:45
We’ve lost a lot of humanity and depth in the way we approach subjects like this in the modern discourse
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:45
^^
AngryMiniCar
21:09
^^ I also second that (third actually)
21:17
my experience working with a defense contractor is exactly the reason I hold this opinion
21:18
I literally worked across the room from a team working on AI targeting software for drone strikes
21:20
and by AI targeting software I mean AI that identifies “high value” targets
21:20
aka school buses full of children or hospitals
OlDirtyBtard
22:07
death star operator calls stormtroopers baby killers
OlDirtyBtard
22:07
wild
22:14
yeah I mean if you wanna call veterans Nazis surely you’re on a pretty equivalent standing here
22:15
do you think it would be accurate or truthful if someone were to describe you that way?
OlDirtyBtard
22:27
i think he's worse actually. vets can be anything from infantry (probably kill one or two guys max) to support staff (kill nobody). if you make industrial weapons you are facilitating higher levels of violence
22:35
Fair, though I can step back and recognize my naivety and come to the conclusions I have. Rather than arguing that any attack against me in unjustified
22:36
But tbf I did get fired for being too politically outspoken
OlDirtyBtard
22:39
i mean honestly forget about attacking anyone. i think if you really care about these issues it's best to look at it from a systemic lens rather than spewing bile
OlDirtyBtard
22:41
also fwiw some of the biggest anti-war advocates are veterans. see the "winter soldier" protest movement during the Vietnam war
I wasnt infantry but every marine is a riffleman. I also didnt join for the financial need. I ended up leaving s footprint int he service by making policy to help service members with their immigration status/family member status for the DoD. Call it whatever you want but those are the meaningful things and experience I bring with me to Law School.
a* the* sorry lol
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:59
Sounds like you'll have plenty with which to dazzle admissions committees. Also sounds like nobody in here is a vet lol. Maybe try r/lawschooladmissions?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
0:03
Or possibly even reach out to admissions offices at schools you're interested in. Often they have current students who serve as admissions ambassadors, and you can ask to be put in touch with someone who fits a specific profile (e.g., a veteran). Doesn't hurt to try, and showing early interest in a school is never a bad idea anyway (supposedly they keep track of contact with applicants/prospective students)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.