Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

primary officer

Read a random definition: plain-meaning rule

A quick definition of primary officer:

A primary officer is a person who holds a position of trust, authority, or command. This can be someone who works for the government or a corporation and is authorized to perform specific duties. They are sometimes called the principal officer. A primary officer is the person with the most authority among a group of officers. For example, the CEO of a company is a primary officer because they are responsible for managing the daily operations of the business.

A more thorough explanation:

A primary officer is a person who holds an office of trust, authority, or command. This term is often used to refer to a person holding public office under a national, state, or local government, and authorized by that government to exercise some specific function. In corporate law, the term refers to a person elected or appointed by the board of directors to manage the daily operations of a corporation, such as a CEO, president, secretary, or treasurer.

For example, the CEO of a company is a primary officer because they are responsible for managing the daily operations of the corporation. Similarly, the governor of a state is a primary officer because they are authorized by the state government to exercise specific functions, such as signing bills into law.

It is important to note that a primary officer may have subordinate officers who report to them and assist in carrying out their duties. However, the primary officer is ultimately responsible for the actions of their subordinates.

primary obligation | primary plea

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
trees1234567
14:57
they tend to interview people
trees1234567
14:57
during the month of may
ClassyPleasantHeron
14:58
Yeah, it looks like they sent the feeler email the week before Memorial Day. I guess I wouldn't expect them to make any offers until they send that out.
trees1234567
15:00
yeah I guess more waiting!
trees1234567
15:00
that is okay though!
trees1234567
15:04
thank u for looking deeper into it heron!
ClassyPleasantHeron
15:11
You're welcome. I'm still surprised that they don't act sooner, though. Wish I could figure out why.
has anybody ever done a WL interview
trees1234567
15:13
@ClassyPleasantHeron: I feel like they are potentially waiting out other T-6 waitlists
trees1234567
15:14
to see if they lose any people to other similarly ranked schools
ClassyPleasantHeron
15:15
I guess? All of the T6 have a May 1st deadline, so I wouldn't expect UChicago to go last.
trees1234567
15:17
right I agree - that's the only thing I could come up with haha
ClassyPleasantHeron
15:43
Thought I just had about UChicago: I wonder if they're (relatively) stingy about financial aid, such that they end up losing deposited students during May once the aid is sorted out. They have a 5/31 deadline for loan applications, so that would jibe.
Is Northwestern really a T2 school?
trees1234567
15:45
good point heron
ClassyPleasantHeron
15:45
T2 as in Tier or as in Top?
The Law School Tiers article has them as T2
... that's cap imo but your mileage will vary
ClassyPleasantHeron
15:46
Yeah, I'd consider them in the 7-14 -- squarely in the traditional top 14, but also squarely outside of the top six.
They consider Tier 1 any T14 in the article, must be outdated.
yeah their above the law rankings are also outdated
this is the current list
ClassyPleasantHeron
15:47
I'm shocked that LSD has outdated, incorrect information. Shocked, I say!
Lol is that a common thing?
yes, very
They also have Berkeley and UCLA as T2.... lol
And Stanford!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.