Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Read a random definition: office expense

A quick definition of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896):

Plessy v. Ferguson was a court case in 1896 that said it was okay to have separate places for people of different races as long as they were equal. This meant that black people and white people could be kept apart in public places like schools and trains. The case was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was a Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the doctrine of "separate but equal."

Overview: In 1890, Louisiana passed a law that required railroad companies to provide separate accommodations for white and black passengers. Homer Plessy, a man who was 7/8 Caucasian and 1/8 Black, was arrested for refusing to leave a whites-only passenger car. Plessy argued that the law violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that the law was constitutional as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality.

Example: Plessy v. Ferguson is an example of how the Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution in a way that allows for discrimination. The Court's decision in this case allowed for segregation to continue in the United States for several decades, leading to widespread inequality and injustice for Black Americans.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution can have a significant impact on society. In this case, the Court's decision allowed for segregation to continue, which had a devastating effect on Black Americans. It shows how the law can be used to justify discrimination and how important it is to have a fair and impartial judiciary that upholds the principles of equality and justice for all.

Plenary session | Plyler v. Doe

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
diva down?
wasn't digifarthoe a user on here??? i can't even find them in search
10:58
A longtime, though infrequent user of this site from the early days of da cycle. @OGs help me out
10:58
@badhorrormovie: yes, maybe got 404ed who knows.
NosyBeagle
10:59
rip digifathoe
THEY KILLED DIGIFARTHOE NOOOOO
NosyBeagle
10:59
pour one out for the homie
10:59
MKUltra got him, I bet.
11:00
pour one out lmao
NosyBeagle
11:00
he was hacked by the government
yet another thing trump stole from us
AngryMiniCar
11:02
@llama: I think premium crane is DigiFartHoe lol
NosyBeagle
11:03
digifarthoe become racistfarthoe?
11:03
Did they Tariff trolls now? What next, tar riffing hugs and kisses to loved ones?
11:03
XOXO Don, 1984 was a cautionary tale, not a template of the future, RIP
NosyBeagle
11:03
ok i allow myself an hour of goof off time on lsd law before i go cry over LR byebye
11:04
cya killa
RACISTFARTHOE I'M CRYINGGGJJFKJGFK
11:04
Hes not racist, he is just really good at pattern recognition.
11:05
(is what a racist would say/cope)
11:05
the lsat is my bitch and ima fuck it in the ass tomorrow 💪😤
AngryMiniCar
11:06
YES GL!
AngryMiniCar
11:06
WE BELIEVE IN YOU BUD
11:07
GL
GOOD LUCK NEMO YOU GOT THIS
11:08
my cock of knowledge is massive and will tear that metaphorical lsat ass up
11:08
Here is a motivational video to get your endorphins flowin b4 u sign on to Prometric: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nkRYxxI00cQ?feature=share
11:09
AINT NOTHIN BUT A PEANUT
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:26
I also think crane is digi
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:26
Good luck tomorrow nemopropheta!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.