Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

physician-patient privilege

Read a random definition: dedimus potestatum

A quick definition of physician-patient privilege:

Physician-patient privilege is a rule that keeps private the conversations between a doctor and their patient. This means that doctors cannot share information about their patients with anyone else, unless the patient agrees. The rule only applies to legal cases, and not to other situations. Both the patient and the doctor can use this rule to protect their conversations. However, the rule is different in each state. This rule is not the same as doctor-patient confidentiality, which is a law that keeps medical records private.

A more thorough explanation:

Physician-patient privilege is a legal protection that ensures the privacy and confidentiality of conversations between a medical professional and their patient. This protection allows patients to fully disclose their medical information to their doctors without fear of legal consequences.

The privilege only applies to legal proceedings, meaning that medical professionals cannot testify about a patient's medical information unless the patient waives this privilege. However, information shared between a patient and their physician that is not related to their direct medical care may not be privileged.

Either a patient or a physician can assert physician-patient privilege in a lawsuit. However, the rules governing this privilege may vary from state to state.

For example, if a patient tells their doctor about a medical condition that they do not want others to know about, such as a mental health issue, the physician-patient privilege would protect that information from being disclosed in a legal proceeding.

Physician-patient privilege is different from doctor-patient confidentiality, which protects a patient's medical records and information outside of the context of a lawsuit. Doctor-patient confidentiality is granted by state and federal statutes, such as the HIPAA Privacy Act.

physician-assisted suicide | picketing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:25
Hi llama!!
21:15
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: How are you!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
tbh kinda losing my mind, I'm visiting my parents in my childhood home and whenever I do this I remember why I never do this aahhaha
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
My dog likes it here tho
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
How are youuuuu?
22:26
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Deep/tough. Feels. Im well working on a project so im happy :)
22:28
should i hit the dmt pen in the sauna and meet god
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
Ooh what kind of project? Work, passion, neither, both?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
@NemoPropheta: do it do it
22:37
alright day before my lsat ill hit a blinker in the sauna and become one with the test
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.