Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

per capita

Read a random definition: REG. LIB.

A quick definition of per capita:

Per capita means to determine something based on the number of people. For example, if we want to know how much money a country makes per person, we can divide the total amount of money by the number of people living in that country. This is called Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. In a will, per capita is used to decide how property is divided among beneficiaries. If a beneficiary dies before the person who made the will, their share of the property can be given to their children. Per capita means that the property will be divided equally among all the children, regardless of which side of the family they are on.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Per capita is a Latin term that means "by head." It is used to determine something based on the number of people. For example, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita refers to a country's GDP divided by its population.

Per capita is also used in wills to determine how property is divided among beneficiaries. If a beneficiary dies before the testator, leaving children of their own, the term per capita is used to determine what share of the property each beneficiary gets. For example, if a will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property per capita, each beneficiary will receive an equal share of the property.

For instance, let's say that a father leaves his house jointly to his son and daughter. However, the son dies before the father, leaving two children. If the father's will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property per capita, the daughter and the two grandchildren will each take a third of the property.

It is important to note that courts will look at the language used in the will to determine whether the beneficiaries are to receive the property per capita or per stirpes. If the testator specifically referenced the beneficiaries claiming to inherit through a will per capita, then the beneficiaries will receive the property per capita.

For example, in Maud v. Catherwood, the California District Court of Appeal ruled that the testator did not intend to name the grandchildren as beneficiaries per capita because he referred to them as "descendants" and not as "grandchildren."

Per | per curiam

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:25
Hi llama!!
21:15
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: How are you!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
tbh kinda losing my mind, I'm visiting my parents in my childhood home and whenever I do this I remember why I never do this aahhaha
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
My dog likes it here tho
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
How are youuuuu?
22:26
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Deep/tough. Feels. Im well working on a project so im happy :)
22:28
should i hit the dmt pen in the sauna and meet god
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
Ooh what kind of project? Work, passion, neither, both?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
@NemoPropheta: do it do it
22:37
alright day before my lsat ill hit a blinker in the sauna and become one with the test
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.