Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-contest clause

Read a random definition: self-employed

A quick definition of no-contest clause:

A no-contest clause is a rule that a person can put in their will that says if someone tries to challenge the will after they die, they won't get any of the money or things that were left to them. Different states have different rules about whether or not this rule can be enforced. Sometimes, if the person challenging the will had a good reason to do so, like if they thought something was wrong with the will, they might still be able to get their share. But it's important to check with a judge before trying to challenge a will with a no-contest clause.

A more thorough explanation:

A no-contest clause (NCC), also known as in terrorem clause, is a provision in a will that takes away a beneficiary's inheritance if they challenge the will after the testator's death. This means that if a beneficiary tries to contest the will, they risk losing their share of the inheritance.

The enforceability of a no-contest clause varies by state. In most states, the clause is enforced if the beneficiary's actions violate the terms of the clause. However, some states recognize the "probable cause" exception, which means that if the beneficiary had a reasonable belief that their claim was valid, they may still receive their inheritance even if they challenged the will.

For example, in a case from Georgia, the court decided that the probable cause exception did not apply. This means that the beneficiary who challenged the will lost their inheritance. However, beneficiaries can seek a court judgment to determine whether their challenge would trigger the no-contest clause of the will.

Overall, a no-contest clause is a way for a testator to discourage beneficiaries from challenging their will and to ensure that their wishes are carried out after their death.

No-answer default judgment | no-fault divorce

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
hey y'all so im gonna be honest im completely new to all this, i kinda bullshitted and took the LSAT and i have no clue what my odds are of getting into schools. 163 LSAT, 3.17 GPA, and a double major in undergrad i may write about in an addendum
Based on the list I see you made on your profile, you will need to make significant LSAT improvement for those schools to be contenders. Your primary focus should probably be working to get your LSAT practice tests up to a number you are happy with before you retest, and then test until you get a score you like. Don't rush an application cycle or apply late since those will hurt your odds of getting into your school as a splitter. Good luck!
oh that was literally just random stuff i dont know how this works
thank you so much!
im retaking in 4 days, and maybe again in august, and i was gonna apply to see what i got, and if i didnt like it i was going to wait till next cycle and work on improving my GPA
@InnateMatureRhino: wow rude
yall need help fr
0:51
chat should i go to uc davis or loyola
TheOrangeGorillla
1:58
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/UnsuitableExoticTiger Is this real chat?
AngryMiniCar
9:21
Could be depending on those softs
Waiting on Notre Dame, Fordham, Gould, and Texas A&M.
🙏
Hurry tf up
10:05
coworker watching insta reels at full volume i’m boutta crash the fuck out
10:05
That one coworker thats just gotta go. God hes ready. God take him please god
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.